dc.contributor.author |
Jost, JT |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Becker, J |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Osborne, Daniel |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Badaan, V |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2017-11-26T21:06:11Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0963-7214 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/36553 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
Social-psychological models of collective action emphasize three antecedents of protest: (a) anger at perceived injustice, (b) social identification, and (c) beliefs about group efficacy. These models are extremely useful but have rarely incorporated ideological factors—despite the fact that protests occur in societal contexts in which some people are motivated to defend and bolster the status quo whereas others are motivated to challenge and oppose it. We adopt a system-justification perspective to specify when individuals and groups will—and will not—experience moral outrage and whether such outrage will be directed at defenders versus critics of the status quo. We describe evidence that epistemic, existential, and relational needs for certainty, security, and affiliation undermine support for system-challenging protests by increasing system-defensive motivation. We also discuss system-based emotions and backlash against protestors and propose an integrated model of collective action that paves the way for more comprehensive research on the psychological antecedents of social change. |
en |
dc.language |
English |
en |
dc.publisher |
Association for Psychological Science |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Current Directions in Psychological Science |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.subject |
Social Sciences |
en |
dc.subject |
Psychology, Multidisciplinary |
en |
dc.subject |
Psychology |
en |
dc.subject |
ideology |
en |
dc.subject |
system justification |
en |
dc.subject |
moral outrage |
en |
dc.subject |
collective action |
en |
dc.subject |
protest |
en |
dc.subject |
RELATIVE DEPRIVATION |
en |
dc.subject |
SOCIAL IDENTITY |
en |
dc.subject |
MODEL |
en |
dc.subject |
BACKLASH |
en |
dc.title |
Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior |
en |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1177/0963721417690633 |
en |
pubs.issue |
2 |
en |
pubs.begin-page |
99 |
en |
pubs.volume |
26 |
en |
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: Association for Psychological Science |
en |
pubs.end-page |
108 |
en |
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Article |
en |
pubs.elements-id |
624527 |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Science |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Psychology |
en |
dc.identifier.eissn |
1467-8721 |
en |
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2017-11-27 |
en |