Comparing Curriculum Types: ‘Powerful Knowledge’ and ‘21st Century Learning’

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author McPhail, Graham en
dc.contributor.author Rata, Elizabeth en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-11-29T22:54:07Z en
dc.date.available 2015-10-14 en
dc.date.issued 2016-07 en
dc.identifier.citation New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 51(1):53-68 Jul 2016 en
dc.identifier.issn 0028-8276 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/36607 en
dc.description.abstract This paper theorises a curriculum model containing four features. We use these features as criteria to analyse and evaluate two distinctive curriculum design types: ‘21st Century Learning’ and ‘Powerful Knowledge’. The four features are: (i) the underpinning theory of knowledge in each curriculum design type; (ii) the knowledge structures used to organise the curriculum material; (iii) the organisation of the concepts and content according to the principle of conceptual progression; and (iv) the pedagogy associated with the curriculum design, such as direct instruction or personalised learning. The distinction we make between the two curriculum design types and the comparative approach taken in the paper is justified by the differences found in each of the types with respect to all of the four features. Following the analysis of each feature in the body of the paper we judge the relative merits of each design type in terms of the logical connections between the four theorised features and the ways in which they are realised in 21st Century Learning and Powerful Knowledge respectively. en
dc.language English en
dc.publisher Springer en
dc.relation.ispartofseries New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/journal/40841?detailsPage=pltci_2551698 en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Comparing Curriculum Types: ‘Powerful Knowledge’ and ‘21st Century Learning’ en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s40841-015-0025-9 en
pubs.issue 1 en
pubs.begin-page 53 en
pubs.volume 51 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Springer en
pubs.author-url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40841-015-0025-9 en
pubs.end-page 68 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 503116 en
pubs.org-id Education and Social Work en
pubs.org-id Critical Studies in Education en
pubs.org-id Curriculum and Pedagogy en
dc.identifier.eissn 2199-4714 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2015-11-05 en
pubs.online-publication-date 2015-10-17 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics