The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: Results from an international registry

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Currie, A en
dc.contributor.author Burch, J en
dc.contributor.author Jenkins, JT en
dc.contributor.author Faiz, O en
dc.contributor.author Kennedy, RH en
dc.contributor.author Ljungqvist, O en
dc.contributor.author Demartines, N en
dc.contributor.author Hjern, F en
dc.contributor.author Norderval, S en
dc.contributor.author Lassen, K en
dc.contributor.author Revhaug, A en
dc.contributor.author Koczas, T en
dc.contributor.author Nygren, J en
dc.contributor.author Gustafsson, U en
dc.contributor.author Kornfield, D en
dc.contributor.author Slim, K en
dc.contributor.author Hill, Andrew en
dc.contributor.author Soop, Mattias en
dc.contributor.author Carlander, J en
dc.contributor.author Lundberg, O en
dc.contributor.author Fearon, K en
dc.date.accessioned 2017-12-11T01:46:00Z en
dc.date.issued 2015-06 en
dc.identifier.citation Annals of Surgery 261(6):1153-1159 Jun 2015 en
dc.identifier.issn 0003-4932 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/36721 en
dc.description.abstract Background: The ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) care has been shown in randomized clinical trials to improve outcome after colorectal surgery compared to traditional care. The impact of different levels of compliance and specific elements, particularly out with a trial setting, is poorly understood. Objective: This study evaluated the individual impact of specific patient factors and perioperative enhanced recovery protocol compliance on postoperative outcome after elective primary colorectal cancer resection. Methods: The international, multicenter ERAS registry data, collected between November 2008 and March 2013, was reviewed. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, and perioperative ERAS protocol compliance were assessed. Linear regression was undertaken for primary admission duration and logistic regression for the development of any postoperative complication. Findings: A total of 1509 colonic and 843 rectal resections were undertaken in 13 centers from 6 countries. Median length of stay for colorectal resections was 6 days, with readmissions in 216 (9.2%), complications in 948 (40%), and reoperation in 167 (7.1%) of 2352 patients. Laparoscopic surgery was associated with reduced complications [odds ratio (OR) = 0.68; P < 0.001] and length of stay (OR = 0.83, P < 0.001). Increasing ERAS compliance was correlated with fewer complications (OR = 0.69, P < 0.001) and shorter primary hospital admission (OR = 0.88, P < 0.001). Shorter hospital stay was associated with preoperative carbohydrate and fluid loading (OR = 0.89, P = 0.001), and totally intravenous anesthesia (OR = 0.86, P < 0.001); longer stay was associated with intraoperative epidural analgesia (OR = 1.07, P = 0.019). Reduced postoperative complications were associated with restrictive perioperative intravenous fluids (OR = 0.35, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This analysis has demonstrated that in a large, international cohort of patients, increasing compliance with an ERAS program and the use of laparoscopic surgery independently improve outcome. en
dc.description.uri http://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/pages/articleviewer.aspx?year=2015&issue=06000&article=00020&type=abstract en
dc.publisher Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Annals of Surgery en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.subject colorectal cancer en
dc.subject colorectal surgery en
dc.subject enhanced recovery protocol en
dc.subject laparoscopy en
dc.subject quality assurance en
dc.title The impact of enhanced recovery protocol compliance on elective colorectal cancer resection: Results from an international registry en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001029 en
pubs.issue 6 en
pubs.begin-page 1153 en
pubs.volume 261 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins en
dc.identifier.pmid 25671587 en
pubs.end-page 1159 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 512977 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id School of Medicine en
pubs.org-id South Auckland clinical school en
dc.identifier.eissn 1528-1140 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2015-12-14 en
pubs.dimensions-id 25671587 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics