Engineering Musculoskeletal Tissue: In vitro and in vivo evaluation of novel scaffolds and growth factors for bone regeneration

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Cornish, J en
dc.contributor.advisor Musson, D en
dc.contributor.author Gao, Y en
dc.date.accessioned 2018-01-29T20:47:24Z en
dc.date.issued 2018 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/36886 en
dc.description.abstract Introduction: The management of bony non-unions and large bone defects due to congenital deformities, trauma, degenerative disease, and oncological resection remains a complex challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Currently, autologous bone grafting is the ‘gold standard’ treatment for non-unions and large bone defects because it is the only material that is osteoconductive, osteoinductive and osteogenic. Whilst effective, autologous bone grafting is limited by the finite amount of bone that can be safely harvested and by the unacceptably high complication rates. Aim: The aim of my research was to evaluate a number of growth factors and scaffolds that have the potential to be used as clinically applicable bone graft substitutes. Methods: A systematic method was adopted in the evaluation of bone graft substitutes. Novel materials were first tested using in vitro methods to assess cytocompatibility, proliferative effects and osteoinductive potential on osteoblasts. Bone graft substitutes demonstrating potential were then tested in vivo using our rat critical-sized calvarial defect model. Findings: In total, we evaluated five bone graft substitutes, including bone dust (autologous material), lactoferrin (growth factor), MHC-Cal™ (xenograft), PHB-HV and Gellan gum/hydroxyapatite (scaffolds). Bone dust showed promise as a proliferative agent and osteoinductive material. Lactoferrin demonstrated potent bone regenerative effects in our rat critical-sized calvarial defect model. Whilst the scaffolds (MHC-Cal™, PHB-HV and Gellan gum/HA) demonstrated anabolic effects in vitro, their therapeutic potential failed to translate into our rat critical-sized calvarial defect model. Conclusion: Our research lends further insight on the therapeutic potential for a range of bone graft substitutes for bone regeneration. The two materials with the most potential from our research are bone dust and lactoferrin. Further studies are required to translate any significant findings into the clinical setting. It is hoped that with advances in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine techniques, once formidable clinical entities – large bony defects and bony non-unions can be overcome. en
dc.publisher ResearchSpace@Auckland en
dc.relation.ispartof PhD Thesis - University of Auckland en
dc.relation.isreferencedby UoA99265049414102091 en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/nz/ en
dc.title Engineering Musculoskeletal Tissue: In vitro and in vivo evaluation of novel scaffolds and growth factors for bone regeneration en
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.discipline Medicine en
thesis.degree.grantor The University of Auckland en
thesis.degree.level Doctoral en
thesis.degree.name PhD en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.elements-id 722508 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2018-01-30 en
dc.identifier.wikidata Q112936379


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics