Land Use Regression Models: How Effective are they in Predicting Personal Exposure to Air Pollution?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Salmond, J en
dc.contributor.advisor Dirks, K en
dc.contributor.author Chester, Alana en
dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-14T23:26:32Z en
dc.date.issued 2018 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/37131 en
dc.description Available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland. en
dc.description.abstract Poor air quality is known to be detrimental to human health and studies have shown that data from fixed air quality monitoring sites (FMS) are inadequate in estimating individual exposure to air pollutants. This is primarily because in developed countries, daily exposure to air pollution is largely determined by time spent in the commuter micro-environment which is not well represented by FMS. Pollutant concentrations in urban areas are highly variable in space and time with strong gradients in concentrations observed within, and with distance away from, transport corridors. Land use regression (LUR) models have been shown to be effective tools in interpolating air quality in urban areas and offer the possibility of higher spatial resolution estimates of air quality within transport corridors. Newer generation models are becoming increasingly effective at modelling air quality at local to micro-scales and a range of temporal scales. This study aims to evaluate how effective two of these new generation LUR models, a city scale and a local scale developed for Auckland, are at determining personal exposure to air pollution at a variety of temporal and spatial scales. A set of real-time measurements of personal exposure to nitrogen dioxide (NO2) as well as carbon monoxide (CO) and ultra-fine particles (UFP) were used within this environment to evaluate the given models and compare them to one another. It was found that there was not much difference in ability to predict NO2 concentrations, 73.8% city and 68.8% local predicted correctly, but when using the models as a proxy for UFP and CO, the local model performed significantly better with fewer areas under predicted. Spatial variation of NO2 at the microscale is complex, but the models chosen were able to predict NO2 concentrations within a reasonable margin of error most of the time, with a few exceptions. Being aware of the limitations of these models and LUR in general allows us to come up with new ways of sampling, designing and constructing new models that better represent the micro-environment of interest. en
dc.publisher ResearchSpace@Auckland en
dc.relation.ispartof Masters Thesis - University of Auckland en
dc.relation.isreferencedby UoA99265138413202091 en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights Restricted Item. Available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/nz/ en
dc.title Land Use Regression Models: How Effective are they in Predicting Personal Exposure to Air Pollution? en
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.discipline Environmental Science en
thesis.degree.grantor The University of Auckland en
thesis.degree.level Masters en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.elements-id 740232 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id Population Health en
pubs.org-id Epidemiology & Biostatistics en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2018-05-15 en
dc.identifier.wikidata Q112935931


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics