Automata Recognizing No Words: A Statistical Approach

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Calude, C.S en
dc.contributor.author Campeanu, C en
dc.contributor.author Dumitrescu, M en
dc.date.accessioned 2009-04-16T23:09:48Z en
dc.date.available 2009-04-16T23:09:48Z en
dc.date.issued 2004-05 en
dc.identifier.citation CDMTCS Research Reports CDMTCS-240 (2004) en
dc.identifier.issn 1178-3540 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/3747 en
dc.description.abstract How likely is that a randomly given (non-) deterministic finite automaton recognizes no word? A quick reflection seems to indicate that not too many finite automata accept no word; but, can this intuition be confirmed? In this paper we offer a statistical approach which allows us to conclude that for automata, with a large enough number of states, the probability that a given (non-) deterministic finite automaton recognizes no word is close to zero. More precisely, we will show, with a high degree of accuracy (i.e., with precision higher than 99% and level of confidence 0.9973), that for both deterministic and non-deterministic finite automata: a) the probability that an automaton recognizes no word tends to zero when the number of states and the number of letters in the alphabet tend to infinity, b) if the number of states is fixed and rather small, then even if the number of letters of the alphabet of the automaton tends to infinity, the probability is strictly positive. The result a) is obtained via a statistical analysis; for b) we use a combinatorial and statistical analysis. The present analysis shows that for all practical purposes the fraction of automata recognizing no words tends to zero when the number of states and the number of letters in the alphabet grow indefinitely. In the last section we critically discuss the method and result obtained in this paper. From a theoretical point of view, the result can motivate the search for “certitude”, that is, a proof of the fact established here in probabilistic terms. In fact, the method used is much more important than the result itself. The method is “general” in the sense that it can be applied to a variety of questions in automata theory, certainly some more difficult than the problem solved in this note. en
dc.publisher Department of Computer Science, The University of Auckland, New Zealand en
dc.relation.ispartofseries CDMTCS Research Report Series en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.source.uri http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/staff-cgi-bin/mjd/secondcgi.pl?serial en
dc.title Automata Recognizing No Words: A Statistical Approach en
dc.type Technical Report en
dc.subject.marsden Fields of Research::280000 Information, Computing and Communication Sciences en
dc.rights.holder The author(s) en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics