dc.contributor.author |
Seligman, Jeremy |
en |
dc.coverage.spatial |
Philosophy Department, Nankai University, Tianjin, China |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-10-03T20:07:48Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2012-05-02 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/38529 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
I argue that a concern with formal validity is not a useful point of comparison between ancient Chinese thought and modern logic. Instead, I propose that a better focus is the desire to elucidate the norms and strategies of argumentation. As an example, I outline a (mathematical) model of argumentation inspired by writings of ancient Chinese thinkers, and give some suggestions about how it can be applied. |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.title |
Studying ancient Chinese logic with modern methods |
en |
dc.type |
Presentation |
en |
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: The author |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Oral Presentation (Not presented at a conference) |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Invited |
en |
pubs.elements-id |
648830 |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Arts |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Humanities |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Philosophy |
en |
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2017-08-15 |
en |