The Ireland Principle on Unauthorised but not Improper Purposes: An Exploration and Defence

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wilberg, Hanna en
dc.date.accessioned 2018-10-07T21:26:42Z en
dc.date.issued 2016 en
dc.identifier.issn 1173-5864 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/39114 en
dc.description.abstract One of the leading New Zealand authorities on the illegality ground of judicial review is Attorney-General v Ireland. The Court of Appeal in that case recognised a category of unauthorised but not improper purposes that do not invalidate a decision. This article addresses two questions arising from Ireland. First, it seeks to clarify the extent of toleration of unauthorised purposes following Ireland. Secondly, it defends the decision against the charge that it is fundamentally contrary to the rule of law. en
dc.relation.ispartofseries New Zealand Law Review en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title The Ireland Principle on Unauthorised but not Improper Purposes: An Exploration and Defence en
dc.type Journal Article en
pubs.issue 1 en
pubs.begin-page 95 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.end-page 125 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 535376 en
pubs.org-id Law en
pubs.org-id Faculty Administration Law en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2016-07-11 en
pubs.online-publication-date 2016 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics