dc.contributor.author |
Davys, Allyson |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
May, J |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Burns, B |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
O,Connell, M |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2018-10-08T00:29:08Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2017 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work 29(3):108-121 2017 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
2463-4131 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/39278 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
Abstract INTRODUCTION: The question of whether the practice of professional supervision is effective, and how its effectiveness can be measured, has been debated by both social work and other professions. This study explored how practitioners, supervisors and managers in Aotearoa New Zealand currently evaluate the supervision they receive, provide and/or resource. The study was interprofessional involving counsellors, mental health nurses, psychologists and social workers. This article focuses on the findings from the social work cohort. METHODS: Through an on-line Qualtrics survey participants were asked: 1) how they currently evaluated professional/clinical supervision and 2) how they thought professional/clinical supervision could be evaluated. Data were extracted through the Qualtrics reporting functions and thematic analysis was used to identify themes. A total of 329 participants completed the survey of which 145 (44%) were social workers. FINDINGS: A majority of the social work participants reported that they evaluated supervision in some form. No culture or policy emerged regarding supervision evaluation but social workers expressed interested in training and resources to assist evaluation and some saw a supportive and endorsement role for the professional or regulatory bodies. An unexpected finding was reports of unsatisfactory and harmful supervision. CONCLUSION: Evaluation of supervision is an activity with which social workers engage but further research is needed to explore how evaluation can be embedded in supervision practice. More critically, a broader audit is required to reconsider the definition and model of social work supervision in Aotearoa New Zealand and the environments within which supervision occurs. |
en |
dc.publisher |
Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers Inc. |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
en |
dc.title |
Evaluating social work supervision |
en |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.11157/anzswj-vol29iss3id314 |
en |
pubs.issue |
3 |
en |
pubs.begin-page |
108 |
en |
pubs.volume |
29 |
en |
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: Aotearoa New Zealand Association of Social Workers Inc. |
en |
pubs.end-page |
121 |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Article |
en |
pubs.elements-id |
632742 |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Education and Social Work |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Counselling,HumanServ &Soc.Wrk |
en |
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2017-06-26 |
en |