On the plausibility of scientific hypotheses: Commentary on Mossbridge and Radin (2018)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Schwarzkopf, Dietrich en
dc.date.accessioned 2018-10-10T02:43:47Z en
dc.date.issued 2018-03-01 en
dc.identifier.issn 2326-5523 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/40405 en
dc.description.abstract © 2018 American Psychological Association. Mossbridge and Radin reviewed psychological and physiological experiments that purportedly show time-reversed effects. I discuss why these claims are not plausible. I conclude that scientists should generally consider the plausibility of the hypotheses they test. en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Psychology of Consciousness: Theory Research, and Practice en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title On the plausibility of scientific hypotheses: Commentary on Mossbridge and Radin (2018) en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1037/cns0000125 en
pubs.issue 1 en
pubs.begin-page 94 en
pubs.volume 5 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.end-page 97 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Note en
pubs.subtype Journal en
pubs.elements-id 738429 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id Optometry and Vision Science en
dc.identifier.eissn 2326-5531 en

Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Search ResearchSpace