On the plausibility of scientific hypotheses: Commentary on Mossbridge and Radin (2018)

dc.contributor.author	Schwarzkopf, Dietrich	en
dc.date.accessioned	2018-10-10T02:43:47Z	en
dc.date.issued	2018-03-01	en
dc.identifier.issn	2326-5523	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2292/40405	en
dc.description.abstract	© 2018 American Psychological Association. Mossbridge and Radin reviewed psychological and physiological experiments that purportedly show time-reversed effects. I discuss why these claims are not plausible. I conclude that scientists should generally consider the plausibility of the hypotheses they test.	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Psychology of Consciousness: Theory Research, and Practice	en
dc.rights	Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.	en
dc.rights.uri	https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm	en
dc.title	On the plausibility of scientific hypotheses: Commentary on Mossbridge and Radin (2018)	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1037/cns0000125	en
pubs.issue	1	en
pubs.begin-page	94	en
pubs.volume	5	en
dc.rights.holder	Copyright: The author	en
pubs.end-page	97	en
pubs.publication-status	Published	en
dc.rights.accessrights	http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess	en
pubs.subtype	Note	en
pubs.subtype	Journal	en
pubs.elements-id	738429	en
pubs.org-id	Medical and Health Sciences	en
pubs.org-id	Optometry and Vision Science	en
dc.identifier.eissn	2326-5531	en

Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.