Health promotion funding, workforce recruitment and turnover in New Zealand

ResearchSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Lovell, SA en
dc.contributor.author Egan, R en
dc.contributor.author Robertson, L en
dc.contributor.author Hicks, Karen en
dc.date.accessioned 2018-10-11T21:39:55Z en
dc.date.issued 2015-06 en
dc.identifier.citation Journal of Primary Health Care 7(2):153-157 Jun 2015 en
dc.identifier.issn 1172-6164 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/41018 en
dc.description.abstract INTRODUCTION: Almost a decade on from the New Zealand Primary Health Care Strategy and amidst concerns about funding of health promotion, we undertook a nationwide survey of health promotion providers. AIM: To identify trends in recruitment and turnover in New Zealand's health promotion workforce. METHODS: Surveys were sent to 160 organisations identified as having a health focus and employing one or more health promoter. Respondents, primarily health promotion managers, were asked to report budget, retention and hiring data for 1 July 2009 through 1 July 2010. RESULTS: Responses were received from 53% of organisations. Among respondents, government funding for health promotion declined by 6.3% in the year ended July 2010 and health promoter positions decreased by 7.5% (equalling 36.6 full-time equivalent positions). Among staff who left their roles, 79% also left the field of health promotion. Forty-two organisations (52%) reported employing health promoters on time-limited contracts of three years or less; this employment arrangement was particularly common in public health units (80%) and primary health organisations (57%). Among new hires, 46% (n=55) were identified as Maori. DISCUSSION: Low retention of health promoters may reflect the common use of limited-term employment contracts, which allow employers to alter staffing levels as funding changes. More than half the surveyed primary health organisations reported using fixed-term employment contracts. This may compromise health promotion understanding, culture and institutional memory in these organisations. New Zealand's commitment to addressing ethnic inequalities in health outcomes was evident in the high proportion of Maori who made up new hires. en
dc.publisher Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of Primary Health Care en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en_US en
dc.title Health promotion funding, workforce recruitment and turnover in New Zealand en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1071/HC15153 en
pubs.issue 2 en
pubs.begin-page 153 en
pubs.volume 7 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.declined 2017-10-08T17:03:34.879+1300 en
pubs.end-page 157 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 679941 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2017-10-02 en


Full text options

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en_US Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.en_US

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Advanced Search

Browse