Of teeth and trees: a fossil tip-dating approach to infer divergence times of extinct and extant squaliform sharks.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Flammensbeck, Christina en
dc.contributor.author Pollerspöck, J en
dc.contributor.author Schedel, F en
dc.contributor.author Matzke, Nicholas en
dc.contributor.author Straube, N en
dc.date.accessioned 2018-11-05T01:03:59Z en
dc.date.issued 2018-05-26 en
dc.identifier.issn 0300-3256 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/43885 en
dc.description.abstract Fossil tip‐dating allows for the inclusion of morphological data in divergence time estimates based on both extant and extinct taxa. Neoselachii have a cartilaginous skeleton, which is less prone to fossilization compared to skeletons of Osteichthyans. Therefore, the majority of the neoselachian fossil record is comprised of single teeth, which fossilize more easily. Neoselachian teeth can be found in large numbers as they are continuously replaced. Tooth morphologies are of major importance on multiple taxonomic levels for identification of shark and ray taxa. Here, we review dental morphological characters of squalomorph sharks and test these for their phylogenetic signal. Subsequently, we combine DNA sequence data (concatenated exon sequences) with dental morphological characters from 85 fossil and extant taxa to simultaneously infer the phylogeny and re‐estimate divergence times using information of 61 fossil tip‐dates as well as eight node age calibrations of squalomorph sharks. Our findings show that the phylogenetic placement of fossil taxa is mostly in accordance with their previous taxonomic allocation. An exception is the phylogenetic placement of the extinct genus †Protospinax, which remains unclear. We conclude that the high number of fossil taxa as well as the comprehensive DNA sequence data for extant taxa may compensate for the limited number of morphological characters identifiable on teeth, serving as a backbone for reliably estimating the phylogeny of both extinct and extant taxa. In general, tip‐dating mostly estimates older node ages compared to previous studies based on calibrated molecular clocks. en
dc.publisher Wiley en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Zoologica Scripta en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Of teeth and trees: a fossil tip-dating approach to infer divergence times of extinct and extant squaliform sharks. en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/zsc.12299 en
pubs.begin-page 539 en
pubs.volume 47 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.author-url http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12299 en
pubs.end-page 557 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 751921 en
pubs.org-id Science en
pubs.org-id Biological Sciences en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2018-08-17 en
pubs.online-publication-date 2018-05-26 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics