Audit or research?

Goodyear-Smith, Felicity; Arroll, Bruce

dc.contributor.author	Goodyear-Smith, Felicity	en
dc.contributor.author	Arroll, Bruce	en
dc.date.accessioned	2009-06-18T03:00:41Z	en
dc.date.available	2009-06-18T03:00:41Z	en
dc.date.issued	2001	en
dc.identifier.citation	New Zealand Medical Journal 114 (1143), 500-502. 2001	en
dc.identifier.issn	0028-8446	en
dc.identifier.other	PMID11797877	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2292/4434	en
dc.description	An open access copy of this article is available and complies with the copyright holder/publisher conditions.	en
dc.description.abstract	We wish to bring the vexed question of differentiating ‘audit’ and ‘research’ to the attention of colleagues, and to stimulate debate within our profession regarding the need for ethical appraisal of any study of clinical data. This issue arose in the context of a study we conducted where the decision as to whether this was ‘audit’ or ‘research’ is not clear-cut.	en
dc.publisher	NZMA	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	New Zealand Medical Journal	en
dc.rights	Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0028-8446/	en
dc.rights.uri	https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm	en
dc.rights.uri	http://journal.nzma.org.nz/journal/copyright.html	en
dc.source.uri	http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/114-1143	en
dc.title	Audit or research?	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.subject.marsden	Fields of Research::320000 Medical and Health Sciences	en
pubs.issue	1143	en
pubs.begin-page	500	en
pubs.volume	114	en
dc.description.version	VoR - Version of Record	en
dc.rights.holder	Copyright: New Zealand Medical Association (NZMA)	en
pubs.end-page	502	en
dc.rights.accessrights	http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess	en