Evaluating Maternity Units: a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwife-led primary maternity units in New Zealand-clinical outcomes.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Grigg, Celia en
dc.contributor.author Tracy, Sally K en
dc.contributor.author Tracy, Mark en
dc.contributor.author Daellenbach, Rea en
dc.contributor.author Kensington, Mary en
dc.contributor.author Monk, Amy en
dc.contributor.author Schmied, Virginia en
dc.date.accessioned 2018-12-02T21:53:18Z en
dc.date.issued 2017-08-29 en
dc.identifier.issn 2044-6055 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/44725 en
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVE:To compare maternal and neonatal birth outcomes and morbidities associated with the intention to give birth in a freestanding primary level midwife-led maternity unit (PMU) or tertiary level obstetric-led maternity hospital (TMH) in Canterbury, Aotearoa/New Zealand. DESIGN:Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS:407 women who intended to give birth in a PMU and 285 women who intended to give birth at the TMH in 2010-2011. All of the women planning a TMH birth were 'low risk', and 29 of the PMU cohort had identified risk factors. PRIMARY OUTCOMES:Mode of birth, Apgar score of less than 7 at 5 min and neonatal unit admission. SECONDARY OUTCOMES:labour onset, analgesia, blood loss, third stage of labour management, perineal trauma, non-pharmacological pain relief, neonatal resuscitation, breastfeeding, gestational age at birth, birth weight, severe morbidity and mortality. RESULTS:Women who planned a PMU birth were significantly more likely to have a spontaneous vaginal birth (77.9%vs62.3%, adjusted OR (AOR) 1.61, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.39), and significantly less likely to have an instrumental assisted vaginal birth (10.3%vs20.4%, AOR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.93). The emergency and elective caesarean section rates were not significantly different (emergency: PMU 11.6% vs TMH 17.5%, AOR 0.88, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.40; elective: PMU 0.7% vs TMH 2.1%, AOR 0.34, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.41). There were no significant differences between the cohorts in rates of 5 min Apgar score of <7 (2.0%vs2.1%, AOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.27 to 2.52) and neonatal unit admission (5.9%vs4.9%, AOR 1.44, 95% CI 0.70 to 2.96). Planning to give birth in a primary unit was associated with similar or reduced odds of intrapartum interventions and similar odds of all measured neonatal well-being indicators. CONCLUSIONS:The results of this study support freestanding midwife-led primary-level maternity units as physically safe places for well women to plan to give birth, with these women having higher rates of spontaneous vaginal births and lower rates of interventions and their associated morbidities than those who planned a tertiary hospital birth, with no differences in neonatal outcomes. en
dc.format.medium Electronic en
dc.language eng en
dc.relation.ispartofseries BMJ open en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/2044-6055/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ en
dc.subject Humans en
dc.subject Apgar Score en
dc.subject Pregnancy Outcome en
dc.subject Perinatal Care en
dc.subject Delivery, Obstetric en
dc.subject Multivariate Analysis en
dc.subject Logistic Models en
dc.subject Prospective Studies en
dc.subject Midwifery en
dc.subject Pregnancy en
dc.subject Labor, Obstetric en
dc.subject Adult en
dc.subject Infant, Newborn en
dc.subject Birthing Centers en
dc.subject Delivery Rooms en
dc.subject Patient Satisfaction en
dc.subject New Zealand en
dc.subject Female en
dc.subject Male en
dc.subject Young Adult en
dc.title Evaluating Maternity Units: a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwife-led primary maternity units in New Zealand-clinical outcomes. en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016288 en
pubs.issue 8 en
pubs.begin-page e016288 en
pubs.volume 7 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
dc.identifier.pmid 28851782 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype research-article en
pubs.subtype Multicenter Study en
pubs.subtype Journal Article en
pubs.elements-id 728677 en
pubs.org-id Liggins Institute en
dc.identifier.eissn 2044-6055 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2017-08-31 en
pubs.dimensions-id 28851782 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics