Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Monk, Amy en
dc.contributor.author Tracy, Mark en
dc.contributor.author Foureur, Maralyn en
dc.contributor.author Grigg, Celia en
dc.contributor.author Tracy, Sally en
dc.date.accessioned 2018-12-02T21:55:05Z en
dc.date.issued 2014-10-31 en
dc.identifier.issn 2044-6055 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/44729 en
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVE:To compare maternal and neonatal birth outcomes and morbidities associated with the intention to give birth in two freestanding midwifery units and two tertiary-level maternity units in New South Wales, Australia. DESIGN:Prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS:494 women who intended to give birth at freestanding midwifery units and 3157 women who intended to give birth at tertiary-level maternity units. Participants had low risk, singleton pregnancies and were at less than 28(+0) weeks gestation at the time of booking. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES:Primary outcomes were mode of birth, Apgar score of less than 7 at 5 min and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit or special care nursery. Secondary outcomes were onset of labour, analgesia, blood loss, management of third stage of labour, perineal trauma, transfer, neonatal resuscitation, breastfeeding, gestational age at birth, birth weight, severe morbidity and mortality. RESULTS:Women who planned to give birth at a freestanding midwifery unit were significantly more likely to have a spontaneous vaginal birth (AOR 1.57; 95% CI 1.20 to 2.06) and significantly less likely to have a caesarean section (AOR 0.65; 95% CI 0.48 to 0.88). There was no significant difference in the AOR of 5 min Apgar scores, however, babies from the freestanding midwifery unit group were significantly less likely to be admitted to neonatal intensive care or special care nursery (AOR 0.60; 95% CI 0.39 to 0.91). Analysis of secondary outcomes indicated that planning to give birth in a freestanding midwifery unit was associated with similar or reduced odds of intrapartum interventions and similar or improved odds of indicators of neonatal well-being. CONCLUSIONS:The results of this study support the provision of care in freestanding midwifery units as an alternative to tertiary-level maternity units for women with low risk pregnancies at the time of booking. en
dc.format.medium Electronic en
dc.language eng en
dc.relation.ispartofseries BMJ open en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. Details obtained from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/2044-6055/ en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ en
dc.subject Humans en
dc.subject Apgar Score en
dc.subject Patient Transfer en
dc.subject Delivery, Obstetric en
dc.subject Cesarean Section en
dc.subject Labor, Induced en
dc.subject Cohort Studies en
dc.subject Prospective Studies en
dc.subject Midwifery en
dc.subject Pregnancy en
dc.subject Adult en
dc.subject Infant, Newborn en
dc.subject Birthing Centers en
dc.subject Delivery Rooms en
dc.subject Intensive Care Units, Neonatal en
dc.subject Outcome Assessment (Health Care) en
dc.subject New South Wales en
dc.subject Female en
dc.subject Male en
dc.title Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia. en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006252 en
pubs.issue 10 en
pubs.begin-page e006252 en
pubs.volume 4 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
dc.identifier.pmid 25361840 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't en
pubs.subtype research-article en
pubs.subtype Journal Article en
pubs.elements-id 728692 en
pubs.org-id Liggins Institute en
dc.identifier.eissn 2044-6055 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2014-11-02 en
pubs.dimensions-id 25361840 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics