Abstract:
Abstract Background and Purpose Inter-subject variability complicates trials of novel stroke rehabilitation therapies, particularly in the sub-acute phase after stroke. We tested whether selecting patients using motor evoked potential (MEP) status, a physiological biomarker of motor system function, could improve trial efficiency. Methods A retrospective analysis of data from 207 patients (103 women, mean (SD) 70.6 (15.1) years) was used to estimate sample sizes and recruitment rates required to detect a 7-point difference between hypothetical control and treatment groups in upper-limb Fugl-Meyer and Action Research Arm Test scores at 90 days post-stroke. Analyses were carried out for the full sample and for subsets defined by motor evoked potential (MEP) status. Results Selecting patients according to MEP status reduced the required sample size by 75% compared to an unselected sample. The estimated time needed to recruit the required sample was also reduced by 72% for patients with MEPs, and was increased by 2-3-fold for patients without MEPs. Conclusions Using biomarkers to select patients can improve stroke rehabilitation trial efficiency by reducing the sample size and recruitment time needed to detect a clinically meaningful effect of the tested intervention.