Nurses' views on legalising assisted dying in New Zealand: A cross-sectional study.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wilson, Michael en
dc.contributor.author Oliver, Pam en
dc.contributor.author Malpas, Phillipa en
dc.date.accessioned 2019-03-13T22:03:04Z en
dc.date.issued 2019-01 en
dc.identifier.issn 0020-7489 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/46001 en
dc.description.abstract AIMS:This study investigated New Zealand nurses' views on legalising assisted dying across a range of clinical conditions, nurses' willingness to engage in legal assisted dying, potential deterrents and enablers to such engagement, and nurses' perceptions of the proper role of their professional bodies in relation to legalising assisted dying. BACKGROUND:A Bill for legalising assisted dying is currently before the New Zealand parliament. Of the 16 jurisdictions where assisted dying has been specifically legislated, only the Canadian federal statute provides nurses with explicit legal protection for their performance of assisted dying-related tasks. An absence of policy development and planning for safe nursing practice prior to legalisation of assisted dying results in a gap in professional support and guidance. DESIGN:Exploratory cross-sectional survey. RESPONDENTS:A self-selected sample of 475 New Zealand nurses responded to an anonymous online survey disseminated through the newsletters and websites of relevant medical and nursing professional bodies. A sub-sample of nurses who expressed support for or ambivalence about legalisation (n = 356): rated their level of support for legalising assisted dying in New Zealand across a range of medical conditions, and their willingness to participate in a range of assisted dying tasks; identified barriers and facilitators to potential participation; and assessed the responsibility of the professional bodies to provide practice supports. METHOD:Mixed-method approach using descriptive analysis of quantitative data; qualitative data were analysed thematically. RESULTS:Nurses supported legalisation at a rate (67%) significantly greater than that of doctors (37%) and for a diverse range of medical conditions. Most supporting nurses were willing to engage in the full range of relevant assisted dying roles. They identified several practical and ethical supports as essential to safe engagement, in particular practice guidelines, specific training, legal protections, clinical supervision and mentoring, and independent review of assisted dying service provision. They saw the facilitation of these supports as primarily the responsibility of their professional bodies. IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY:Nursing bodies should proactively facilitate workforce awareness and development of assisted dying policy and practice supports in anticipation of legalisation. This can be done through information campaigns and by adapting assisted dying policy, practice materials and systems already developed internationally. Nursing bodies need to engage in formulating legislation to ensure inclusion of explicit protections for participating nurses and to delegate relevant responsibilities to regulatory bodies. en
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic en
dc.language eng en
dc.relation.ispartofseries International journal of nursing studies en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.subject Humans en
dc.subject Suicide, Assisted en
dc.subject Cross-Sectional Studies en
dc.subject Attitude of Health Personnel en
dc.subject Nurse's Role en
dc.subject Adult en
dc.subject Middle Aged en
dc.subject Nursing Staff en
dc.subject New Zealand en
dc.subject Female en
dc.subject Male en
dc.title Nurses' views on legalising assisted dying in New Zealand: A cross-sectional study. en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.03.012 en
pubs.begin-page 116 en
pubs.volume 89 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
dc.identifier.pmid 29669685 en
pubs.end-page 124 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Journal Article en
pubs.elements-id 738041 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id School of Medicine en
pubs.org-id Psychological Medicine Dept en
dc.identifier.eissn 1873-491X en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2018-04-20 en
pubs.dimensions-id 29669685 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics