Corporate tax avoidance or corporate responsibility?: An examination of the NZX 50 companies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Wong, Norman en
dc.contributor.author Wong, Jilnaught en
dc.date.accessioned 2019-05-28T21:06:27Z en
dc.date.issued 2019-03 en
dc.identifier.issn 1322-4417 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/46792 en
dc.description.abstract This article provides an empirical analysis to see whether New Zealand companies in the NZX 50, between 2015 and 2017, have effective tax rates that are close to the statutory tax rate or whether they reduce their effective tax rates through corporate accounting tax avoidance. The results indicate, after removing the property and retirement and aged care (PRAC) companies from the analysis, the remaining companies listed on the NZX 50 have effective tax rates that are close to the corporate statutory tax rate. For the PRAC companies, their effective tax rates are much lower than the corporate statutory tax rate. However, this is not due to tax avoidance. Their lower effective tax rates are due to the manner in which they account for investment properties. NZ IAS 40 Investment Property allows companies to measure their investment properties at cost or fair value. If the PRAC companies choose the cost model, accounting income would not include the fair value adjustments and their effective tax rates would be close to the corporate statutory tax rate. If they choose the fair value model, accounting income would include the fair value adjustments and because they are non-taxable capital gains, like any company’s capital gains, there is an accounting-induced reduction in the effective tax rates. This is an accounting choice idiosyncrasy caused by the mismatch between the fair value model and the cost model used in the tax law. However, this begs the question why NZ IAS 40 allows companies to choose the fair value model and why all the PRAC companies choose it. The accounting choice literature argues that the cost model is inefficient for contracting between managers and shareholders (eg, executive compensation agreements), and for contracting between shareholders and debtholders (eg, debt covenants). In contrast, the fair value model is an efficient contracting technology for the organisation and governance of PRAC firms. Overall, this article shows that, adjusting for the subsample of PRAC companies, the remaining NZX 50 companies have effective tax rates close to the statutory tax rate. en
dc.relation.ispartofseries New Zealand Journal of Taxation Law and Policy en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title Corporate tax avoidance or corporate responsibility?: An examination of the NZX 50 companies en
dc.type Journal Article en
pubs.issue 1 en
pubs.begin-page 11 en
pubs.volume 25 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.author-url https://catalogue.library.auckland.ac.nz/permalink/f/1v9lq2o/uoa_alma21189454760002091 en
pubs.end-page 30 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 767267 en
pubs.org-id Business and Economics en
pubs.org-id Accounting and Finance en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2019-04-02 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics