Population receptive field estimates for motion-defined stimuli.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hughes, Anna E en
dc.contributor.author Greenwood, John A en
dc.contributor.author Finlayson, Nonie J en
dc.contributor.author Schwarzkopf, Dietrich en
dc.date.accessioned 2019-10-21T22:43:11Z en
dc.date.issued 2019-10 en
dc.identifier.citation NeuroImage 199:245-260 Oct 2019 en
dc.identifier.issn 1053-8119 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/48601 en
dc.description.abstract The processing of motion changes throughout the visual hierarchy, from spatially restricted 'local motion' in early visual cortex to more complex large-field 'global motion' at later stages. Here we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine spatially selective responses in these areas related to the processing of random-dot stimuli defined by differences in motion. We used population receptive field (pRF) analyses to map retinotopic cortex using bar stimuli comprising coherently moving dots. In the first experiment, we used three separate background conditions: no background dots (dot-defined bar-only), dots moving coherently in the opposite direction to the bar (kinetic boundary) and dots moving incoherently in random directions (global motion). Clear retinotopic maps were obtained for the bar-only and kinetic-boundary conditions across visual areas V1-V3 and in higher dorsal areas. For the global-motion condition, retinotopic maps were much weaker in early areas and became clear only in higher areas, consistent with the emergence of global-motion processing throughout the visual hierarchy. However, in a second experiment we demonstrate that this pattern is not specific to motion-defined stimuli, with very similar results for a transparent-motion stimulus and a bar defined by a static low-level property (dot size) that should have driven responses particularly in V1. We further exclude explanations based on stimulus visibility by demonstrating that the observed differences in pRF properties do not follow the ability of observers to localise or attend to these bar elements. Rather, our findings indicate that dorsal extrastriate retinotopic maps may primarily be determined by the visibility of the neural responses to the bar relative to the background response (i.e. neural signal-to-noise ratios) and suggests that claims about stimulus selectivity from pRF experiments must be interpreted with caution. en
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic en
dc.language eng en
dc.relation.ispartofseries NeuroImage en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ en
dc.subject Visual Cortex en
dc.subject Humans en
dc.subject Magnetic Resonance Imaging en
dc.subject Brain Mapping en
dc.subject Motion Perception en
dc.subject Adult en
dc.subject Female en
dc.subject Male en
dc.subject Young Adult en
dc.title Population receptive field estimates for motion-defined stimuli. en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.068 en
pubs.begin-page 245 en
pubs.volume 199 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
pubs.end-page 260 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't en
pubs.subtype research-article en
pubs.subtype Journal Article en
pubs.elements-id 774753 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id Optometry and Vision Science en
dc.identifier.eissn 1095-9572 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2019-06-04 en
pubs.dimensions-id 31158480 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics