DOHaD in developing nations: A systematic review exploring gaps in DOHaD population studies

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tu'akoi, Siobhan en
dc.contributor.author Vickers, Mark en
dc.contributor.author Bay, Jacqueline en
dc.coverage.spatial Melbourne, Australia en
dc.date.accessioned 2019-11-21T03:25:23Z en
dc.date.issued 2019-10-22 en
dc.identifier.citation DOHaD 2019 Congress: Investing in a healthy future for all. 22 Oct 2019 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/48988 en
dc.description.abstract Background/Aims: The developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) paradigm asserts that early-life environmental factors can influence later chronic disease risk. The aim of this review is to identify where these investigations take place, and whether, given the burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in lower-middle income countries, this focus is appropriate and ethical. Studies must investigate on the relationship between the early nutritional environment and later non-communicable disease risk in childhood, adolescence and adulthood. Method: A systematic review was conducted covering publications up to 23 May 2018. A search for literature was conducted in three electronic databases: Medline, EMBASE (both accessed via Ovid) and Scopus. To be included, the studies must have been original, observational DOHaD studies published in academic articles that link maternal nutritional environmental exposures or birth factors to later NCD prevalence or risk. After full text reviews, 138 studies were included in the final review. Results: Of the 138 studies included in this review, 50.3% were based on data from Western Europe, 15.7% from East Asia, 12.5% from North America, 8.1% from Latin America and the Caribbean, 5% from Australasia, 3.1% from South Asia, 1.9% from both the Middle East and the Africas and 1.2% Central Asia. Additionally, this review found that only 4% of studies were based in lower-middle income countries, despite holding 80% of the non-communicable disease burden. Conclusions: There is a disconnect between the regions highly burdened by NCDs and the areas where most of the DOHaD research occurs. As it stands, majority of research and funding is focused on high income countries with little emphasis given to lower income nations or indigenous populations whom have higher rates of NCDs and poor outcomes. To improve health for vulnerable communities in both developed and developing nations, there needs to be more resources put towards these burdened populations whom may benefit most from DOHaD research and related strategies. en
dc.relation.ispartof DOHaD 2019 Congress: Investing in a healthy future for all en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title DOHaD in developing nations: A systematic review exploring gaps in DOHaD population studies en
dc.type Conference Poster en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
pubs.author-url https://www.xcdsystem.com/dohad/program/iiI9PV5/index.cfm?pgid=470&printmode=1&sid=14252&abid=57381 en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.elements-id 785538 en
pubs.org-id Liggins Institute en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2019-11-11 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics