Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.

ResearchSpace/Manakin Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Alexander, Harry C en
dc.contributor.author Nguyen, Cindy H en
dc.contributor.author Moore, Matthew en
dc.contributor.author Bartlett, Adam en
dc.contributor.author Sturge, Jacqueline en
dc.contributor.author Poole, Garth H en
dc.contributor.author Merry, Alan en
dc.date.accessioned 2019-11-21T21:09:05Z en
dc.date.issued 2019-07 en
dc.identifier.citation Surgical endoscopy 33(7):2061-2071 Jul 2019 en
dc.identifier.issn 0930-2794 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/49029 en
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND:Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs) are increasingly used as endpoints in surgical trials. PROs need to be consistently measured and reported to accurately evaluate surgical care. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a commonly performed procedure which may be evaluated by PROs. We aimed to evaluate the frequency and consistency of PRO measurement and reporting after LC. METHODS:MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for prospective studies reporting PROs of LC, between 2013 and 2016. Data on the measurement and reporting of PROs were extracted. RESULTS:A total of 281 studies were evaluated. Forty-five unique multi-item questionnaires were identified, most of which were used in single studies (n = 35). One hundred and ten unique rating scales were used to assess 358 PROs. The visual analogue scale was used to assess 24 different PROs, 17 of which were only reported in single studies. Details about the type of rating scale used were not given for 72 scales. Three hundred and twenty-three PROs were reported in 162 studies without details given about the scale or questionnaire used to evaluate them. CONCLUSIONS:Considerable variation was identified in the choice of PROs reported after LC, and in how they were measured. PRO measurement for LC is focused on short-term outcomes, such as post-operative pain, rather than longer-term outcomes. Consideration should be given towards the development of a core outcome set for LC which incorporates PROs. en
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic en
dc.language eng en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Surgical endoscopy en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri https://www.springer.com/gp/open-access/publication-policies/self-archiving-policy en
dc.title Measurement of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s00464-019-06745-7 en
pubs.issue 7 en
pubs.begin-page 2061 en
pubs.volume 33 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Springer Nature en
pubs.end-page 2071 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't en
pubs.subtype Journal Article en
pubs.elements-id 775706 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id Medical Sciences en
pubs.org-id Pharmacology en
pubs.org-id School of Medicine en
pubs.org-id Clinical Sciences Admin en
pubs.org-id Surgery Department en
pubs.org-id Science en
pubs.org-id Science Research en
pubs.org-id Maurice Wilkins Centre (2010-2014) en
dc.identifier.eissn 1432-2218 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2019-04-03 en
pubs.dimensions-id 30937619 en


Full text options

Full text for this item is not available in ResearchSpace.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Advanced Search

Browse