dc.contributor.author |
Lovell, Amy |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Davies, Peter SW |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Hill, Rebecca J |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Milne, Tania |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Matsuyama, Misa |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Jiang, Yannan |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Chen, Rachel |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Grant, Cameron |
en |
dc.contributor.author |
Wall, Clare |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-02-11T22:48:19Z |
en |
dc.date.issued |
2019-03 |
en |
dc.identifier.citation |
British journal of nutrition 121(6):678-687 Mar 2019 |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0007-1145 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/49918 |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
The second year of life is a period of nutritional vulnerability. We aimed to investigate the dietary patterns and nutrient intakes from 1 to 2 years of age during the 12-month follow-up period of the Growing Up Milk - Lite (GUMLi) trial. The GUMLi trial was a multi-centre, double-blinded, randomised controlled trial of 160 healthy 1-year-old children in Auckland, New Zealand and Brisbane, Australia. Dietary intakes were collected at baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-randomisation, using a validated FFQ. Dietary patterns were identified using principal component analysis of the frequency of food item consumption per d. The effect of the intervention on dietary patterns and intake of eleven nutrients over the duration of the trial were investigated using random effects mixed models. A total of three dietary patterns were identified at baseline: 'junk/snack foods', 'healthy/guideline foods' and 'breast milk/formula'. A significant group difference was observed in 'breast milk/formula' dietary pattern z scores at 12 months post-randomisation, where those in the GUMLi group loaded more positively on this pattern, suggesting more frequent consumption of breast milk. No difference was seen in the other two dietary patterns. Significant intervention effects were seen on nutrient intake between the GUMLi (intervention) and cows' milk (control) groups, with lower protein and vitamin B12, and higher Fe, vitamin D, vitamin C and Zn intake in the GUMLi (intervention) group. The consumption of GUMLi did not affect dietary patterns, however, GUMLi participants had lower protein intake and higher Fe, vitamins D and C and Zn intake at 2 years of age. |
en |
dc.format.medium |
Print |
en |
dc.language |
eng |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
The British journal of nutrition |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
en |
dc.rights |
This article has been published in British journal of nutrition http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0007114518003847. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use. © The Authors |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/open-access-policies/open-access-journals/green-open-access-policy-for-journals |
en |
dc.subject |
Milk |
en |
dc.subject |
Animals |
en |
dc.subject |
Cattle |
en |
dc.subject |
Humans |
en |
dc.subject |
Treatment Outcome |
en |
dc.subject |
Diet |
en |
dc.subject |
Diet Surveys |
en |
dc.subject |
Longitudinal Studies |
en |
dc.subject |
Follow-Up Studies |
en |
dc.subject |
Double-Blind Method |
en |
dc.subject |
Feeding Behavior |
en |
dc.subject |
Energy Intake |
en |
dc.subject |
Nutritional Requirements |
en |
dc.subject |
Infant Formula |
en |
dc.subject |
Food, Fortified |
en |
dc.subject |
Infant |
en |
dc.subject |
Australia |
en |
dc.subject |
New Zealand |
en |
dc.subject |
Female |
en |
dc.subject |
Male |
en |
dc.subject |
Infant Nutritional Physiological Phenomena |
en |
dc.title |
A comparison of the effect of a Growing Up Milk - Lite (GUMLi) v. cows' milk on longitudinal dietary patterns and nutrient intakes in children aged 12-23 months: the GUMLi randomised controlled trial. |
en |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1017/s0007114518003847 |
en |
pubs.issue |
6 |
en |
pubs.begin-page |
678 |
en |
pubs.volume |
121 |
en |
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: The authors |
en |
pubs.end-page |
687 |
en |
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Comparative Study |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Multicenter Study |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Randomized Controlled Trial |
en |
pubs.subtype |
Journal Article |
en |
pubs.elements-id |
768398 |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Medical and Health Sciences |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Medical Sciences |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Nutrition |
en |
pubs.org-id |
School of Medicine |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Paediatrics Child & Youth Hlth |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Science |
en |
pubs.org-id |
Statistics |
en |
dc.identifier.eissn |
1475-2662 |
en |
pubs.record-created-at-source-date |
2019-03-27 |
en |
pubs.dimensions-id |
30912737 |
en |