Probability of major depression diagnostic classification using semi-structured versus fully structured diagnostic interviews.

Show simple item record Levis, Brooke en Benedetti, Andrea en Riehm, Kira E en Saadat, Nazanin en Levis, Alexander W en Azar, Marleine en Rice, Danielle B en Chiovitti, Matthew J en Sanchez, Tatiana A en Cuijpers, Pim en Gilbody, Simon en Ioannidis, John PA en Kloda, Lorie A en McMillan, Dean en Patten, Scott B en Shrier, Ian en Steele, Russell J en Ziegelstein, Roy C en Akena, Dickens H en Arroll, Bruce en Ayalon, Liat en Baradaran, Hamid R en Baron, Murray en Beraldi, Anna en Bombardier, Charles H en Butterworth, Peter en Carter, Gregory en Chagas, Marcos H en Chan, Juliana CN en Cholera, Rushina en Chowdhary, Neerja en Clover, Kerrie en Conwell, Yeates en de Man-van Ginkel, Janneke M en Delgadillo, Jaime en Fann, Jesse R en Fischer, Felix H en Fischler, Benjamin en Fung, Daniel en Gelaye, Bizu en Goodyear-Smith, Felicity en Greeno, Catherine G en Hall, Brian J en Hambridge, John en Harrison, Patricia A en Hegerl, Ulrich en Hides, Leanne en Hobfoll, Stevan E en Hudson, Marie en Hyphantis, Thomas en Inagaki, Masatoshi en Ismail, Khalida en Jetté, Nathalie en Khamseh, Mohammad E en Kiely, Kim M en Lamers, Femke en Liu, Shen-Ing en Lotrakul, Manote en Loureiro, Sonia R en Löwe, Bernd en Marsh, Laura en McGuire, Anthony en Mohd Sidik, Sherina en Munhoz, Tiago N en Muramatsu, Kumiko en Osório, Flávia L en Patel, Vikram en Pence, Brian W en Persoons, Philippe en Picardi, Angelo en Rooney, Alasdair G en Santos, Iná S en Shaaban, Juwita en Sidebottom, Abbey en Simning, Adam en Stafford, Lesley en Sung, Sharon en Tan, Pei Lin Lynnette en Turner, Alyna en van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M en van Weert, Henk C en Vöhringer, Paul A en White, Jennifer en Whooley, Mary A en Winkley, Kirsty en Yamada, Mitsuhiko en Zhang, Yuying en Thombs, Brett D en 2020-05-06T03:44:01Z en 2018-06 en
dc.identifier.issn 0007-1250 en
dc.identifier.uri en
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND:Different diagnostic interviews are used as reference standards for major depression classification in research. Semi-structured interviews involve clinical judgement, whereas fully structured interviews are completely scripted. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), a brief fully structured interview, is also sometimes used. It is not known whether interview method is associated with probability of major depression classification.AimsTo evaluate the association between interview method and odds of major depression classification, controlling for depressive symptom scores and participant characteristics. METHOD:Data collected for an individual participant data meta-analysis of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) diagnostic accuracy were analysed and binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit. RESULTS:A total of 17 158 participants (2287 with major depression) from 57 primary studies were analysed. Among fully structured interviews, odds of major depression were higher for the MINI compared with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) (odds ratio (OR) = 2.10; 95% CI = 1.15-3.87). Compared with semi-structured interviews, fully structured interviews (MINI excluded) were non-significantly more likely to classify participants with low-level depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 scores ≤6) as having major depression (OR = 3.13; 95% CI = 0.98-10.00), similarly likely for moderate-level symptoms (PHQ-9 scores 7-15) (OR = 0.96; 95% CI = 0.56-1.66) and significantly less likely for high-level symptoms (PHQ-9 scores ≥16) (OR = 0.50; 95% CI = 0.26-0.97). CONCLUSIONS:The MINI may identify more people as depressed than the CIDI, and semi-structured and fully structured interviews may not be interchangeable methods, but these results should be replicated.Declaration of interestDrs Jetté and Patten declare that they received a grant, outside the submitted work, from the Hotchkiss Brain Institute, which was jointly funded by the Institute and Pfizer. Pfizer was the original sponsor of the development of the PHQ-9, which is now in the public domain. Dr Chan is a steering committee member or consultant of Astra Zeneca, Bayer, Lilly, MSD and Pfizer. She has received sponsorships and honorarium for giving lectures and providing consultancy and her affiliated institution has received research grants from these companies. Dr Hegerl declares that within the past 3 years, he was an advisory board member for Lundbeck, Servier and Otsuka Pharma; a consultant for Bayer Pharma; and a speaker for Medice Arzneimittel, Novartis, and Roche Pharma, all outside the submitted work. Dr Inagaki declares that he has received grants from Novartis Pharma, lecture fees from Pfizer, Mochida, Shionogi, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma, Daiichi-Sankyo, Meiji Seika and Takeda, and royalties from Nippon Hyoron Sha, Nanzando, Seiwa Shoten, Igaku-shoin and Technomics, all outside of the submitted work. Dr Yamada reports personal fees from Meiji Seika Pharma Co., Ltd., MSD K.K., Asahi Kasei Pharma Corporation, Seishin Shobo, Seiwa Shoten Co., Ltd., Igaku-shoin Ltd., Chugai Igakusha and Sentan Igakusha, all outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests. No funder had any role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. en
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic en
dc.language eng en
dc.relation.ispartofseries The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri en
dc.subject Humans en
dc.subject Probability en
dc.subject Depression en
dc.subject Depressive Disorder, Major en
dc.subject Psychiatric Status Rating Scales en
dc.subject Interview, Psychological en
dc.subject Adult en
dc.subject Female en
dc.subject Male en
dc.subject Meta-Analysis as Topic en
dc.title Probability of major depression diagnostic classification using semi-structured versus fully structured diagnostic interviews. en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1192/bjp.2018.54 en
pubs.issue 6 en
pubs.begin-page 377 en
pubs.volume 212 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
dc.identifier.pmid 29717691 en
pubs.end-page 385 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights en
pubs.subtype Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. en
pubs.subtype Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't en
pubs.subtype research-article en
pubs.subtype Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. en
pubs.subtype Journal Article en
pubs.subtype Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural en
pubs.elements-id 739510 en Medical and Health Sciences en Population Health en Gen.Practice& Primary Hlthcare en
dc.identifier.eissn 1472-1465 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2018-05-03 en
pubs.dimensions-id 29717691 en

Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Search ResearchSpace