Living closer together, better

ResearchSpace Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Waghorn, K en
dc.contributor.author Boanas, Samuel en
dc.date.accessioned 2020-05-12T02:10:20Z en
dc.date.available 2020-05-12T02:10:20Z en
dc.date.issued 2020 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/50649 en
dc.description Full Text is available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland only. en
dc.description.abstract This thesis examines how architectural designs, real estate processes and media language combine to produce narratives that define the private house primarily as a commodity. This stems from an examination of the language used to express the Auckland ‘housing crisis’, that came to a head in 2017 when the city’s median house price reached ten times the city’s median household income. Whether for use as a residence or as a means of income generation, the underlying narrative in the public discussion on housing is that the primary function of a domestic property is wealth accumulation, rather than shelter, security, privacy, agency, or other important aspects of dwelling and home ownership. Many of these issues are exemplified at McLennan, a new suburban housing development in Takanini, on Auckland’s southern rural boundary. Marketed to firsthome buyers as a way of starting their journey on the ‘property ladder’, at McLennan the pressure of high land prices has seen the New Zealand ideal detached house on a plot of land scaled down to an ‘affordable’ size. Garages, master-bedrooms, en-suites and gardens are not disposed with, instead all facets of the suburban ‘ranch style’ home are shrunk to a minimum. In the context of extreme unaffordability, this thesis questions whether this is appropriate or desirable, and an alternative solution is imagined for a block at McLennan. The speculative design investigates the possibilities that emerge when ‘the house’ is not assumed as a singular, detached object to house a nuclear family. Drawing on analysis of higher density precedent projects, and accepting the situation where the house is indeed an asset, housing in this project is reconceived as a more flexible infrastructure that seeks and supports more variable familial structures, more contemporary relationships between home and work, and the provision of ‘third spaces’ that encompass ideas of a sharing economy, from the ability to sublet a room through Airbnb, to the sharing of laundries and gardening tools. The project is designed around the belief that if a domestic property is going to cost ten times the average median income, its design must ensure flexible inhabitation and support alternative ways of increasing equity. en
dc.publisher ResearchSpace@Auckland en
dc.relation.ispartof Masters Thesis - University of Auckland en
dc.relation.isreferencedby UoA en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights Restricted Item. Full Text is available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland only. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/nz/ en
dc.title Living closer together, better en
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.discipline Architecture en
thesis.degree.grantor The University of Auckland en
thesis.degree.level Masters en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.elements-id 801073 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2020-05-12 en


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/nz/ Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/nz/

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

Statistics