Apophenia, unconscious bias and reflexivity in nursing qualitative research.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Buetow, Stephen en
dc.date.accessioned 2020-05-28T22:10:31Z en
dc.date.issued 2019-01 en
dc.identifier.issn 0020-7489 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/50933 en
dc.description.abstract Nurses routinely engage in pattern recognition and interpretation in qualitative research and clinical practice. However, they risk spontaneously perceiving patterns among things that are not meaningfully related. Although all people are prone to this cognitive bias of "apophenia", nurses may be at increased risk because they commonly produce or at least use qualitative research that can be highly interpretive. Qualitative researchers have been silent on the risk of apophenia and hence on exploring how attention to apophenia could help to indicate and manage such unconscious biases. Therefore this conceptual paper suggests how, in disciplines like nursing, researchers could attend to and use reflexivity on signs of possible apophenia to help bring unconscious biases to awareness. Within safe communities of professional practice, the researchers could cooperate with trusted peers to reflect on how and why they may each perceive patterned phenomena from different perspectives. If one reason is that the researchers, for example, appear to exhibit particular unconscious biases, then dialogue could help them to become aware of, and reflect on the biases. This expansion of researchers' consciousness of bias could inform the management of apophenia and enhance the quality of qualitative research and modern nursing practice. en
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic en
dc.language eng en
dc.relation.ispartofseries International journal of nursing studies en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.subject Humans en
dc.subject Mental Processes en
dc.subject Perception en
dc.subject Nursing Research en
dc.subject Qualitative Research en
dc.subject Bias en
dc.title Apophenia, unconscious bias and reflexivity in nursing qualitative research. en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.09.013 en
pubs.begin-page 8 en
pubs.volume 89 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.end-page 13 en
pubs.publication-status Published en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Journal Article en
pubs.elements-id 755070 en
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences en
pubs.org-id Population Health en
pubs.org-id Gen.Practice& Primary Hlthcare en
dc.identifier.eissn 1873-491X en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2018-10-14 en
pubs.dimensions-id 30316055 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics