Abstract:
BACKGROUND:Māori are disproportionately impacted by injury in New Zealand, therefore reliable ethnicity data are essential for measuring and addressing inequities in trauma incidence, care and outcomes. AIM:To audit the quality of ethnicity data captured by the Waikato Hospital Trauma Registry and Waikato Hospital patient management system against self-identified ethnicity. METHOD:Self-identified ethnicity using the New Zealand Census ethnicity question was gathered from 100 consecutive trauma patients and compared with ethnicity recorded in their Trauma Registry record and in the hospital's patient management database. RESULTS:Twenty-nine (29%) participants self-identified as Māori, of whom six were classified as New Zealand European (NZE) only in the Trauma Registry and five as NZE on the hospital patient management database. Over half of Māori (n=18/29) reported more than one ethnicity compared with 4% (n=3/71) of non-Māori. Self-identified ethnicity matched Trauma Registry ethnicity for one quarter (n=7/29) of Māori versus 9% of non-Māori. CONCLUSIONS:The degree of misclassification of Māori ethnicity data among patients in the Waikato Trauma Registry and the Waikato Hospital patient management system highlights a need for improvements to how ethnicity data is captured within these databases and potentially many other similar entities collecting ethnicity data in New Zealand. The release of revised standardised protocols for the collection of ethnicity data is timely given the recent establishment of a national trauma registry. Without quality data, the opportunity to investigate and address ethnic inequities in trauma incidence and management is greatly compromised.
