An experimental study on stainless steel hybrid tubular joints with square braces and circular chord

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Feng, R en
dc.contributor.author Wu, C en
dc.contributor.author Chen, Z en
dc.contributor.author Roy, Krishanu en
dc.contributor.author Chen, B en
dc.contributor.author Lim, James en
dc.date.accessioned 2020-07-06T05:02:04Z en
dc.date.issued 2020-10 en
dc.identifier.issn 0263-8231 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/51860 en
dc.description.abstract This paper presents an experimental investigation of the load-carrying capacities of stainless steel hybrid tubular X-, T- and Y-joints with square braces and circular chord under monotonic loading. In total, 18 tests are reported on hybrid tubular X-, T- and Y-joints, including 9 tests on X-joints, 4 tests on T-joints and the remaining 5 tests on Y-joints. All test specimens were made from austenitic stainless steel of grade AISI 304. The material properties of the test specimens were determined by tensile coupon tests. The failure modes, load-carrying capacities and axial load versus displacement and deformation curves were obtained for all test specimens. The influences of brace width-to-chord diameter ratio (β) on the failure modes and load-carrying capacities of tubular joints were considered. For the specimens with small β value, the chord face plastification was more likely to occur and there was no obvious peak load observed in the load-displacement and load-deformation curves. For the specimens with large β value, the chord side wall failure was dominant. The clear peak load was observed in the load-displacement and load-deformation curves. The test strengths are compared with the results predicted by the current design rules in accordance with International Committee for the Development and Study of Tubular Structures (CIDECT) (2001), Eurocode 3 (EC3) (2005), Chinese Code (GB50017) (2017) and Australian/New Zealand Standard (AS/NZS) (2001). Upon comparison, it is found that the joint strengths calculated using AS/NZS (2001) are larger than test strengths by 2% on average. It is shown that the design formulae provided by CIDECT (2001), EC3 (2005) and GB50017 (2017) are conservative by around 6%, 19% and 20%, respectively, when compared to the test strengths. en
dc.publisher Elsevier en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Thin-Walled Structures en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. en
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.title An experimental study on stainless steel hybrid tubular joints with square braces and circular chord en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.tws.2020.106919 en
pubs.volume 155 en
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article en
pubs.elements-id 804737 en
pubs.org-id Engineering en
pubs.org-id Civil and Environmental Eng en
pubs.number 106919 en
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2020-06-30 en
pubs.online-publication-date 2020-06-29 en


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics