Abstract:
Katherine Mansfield and Zhang Ailing are known as writers of short stories in
which they observed the dynamics of family interaction in societies undergoing
radical social change. Mansfield portrayed New Zealand and European (mostly
British) families in the (post-)Victorian age and the First World War while Zhang
depicted Chinese families in the periods of the fall of the Qing Empire and the May
Fourth Movement. Both writers noted the transformations which the traditional
patriarchal family of their respective cultures underwent in context of these changes,
but as skeptical and pessimistic women, they showed how little improvement resulted
not only for women, but also for men. Current scholarship on both writers mostly
focuses on autobiographical elements and aesthetic issues to reflect their modemist
style and narrative techniques. This thesis takes a new approach which focuses on
the way that these two writers understood the family as a system. It shows how both
writers instinctively, intuitively and independently understood the family systems
perspective, anticipating what would later be theorized by family therapists in the
1950s. Their stories depict families not so much as collections of individuals, but as
homeostatic structures. This study further reveals the remarkable commonalities of
experience, insight and literary praxis shared by these two writers and the insights that
the work of each brings to that of the other in a comparative study. In their stories,
as in family systems theory, individual (subsystem), family (system), and society
(megasystem) form a complex three-tiered feedback habitat. Though both writers
believe family members are individuals first, it is a belief they are pessimistic about.
Imprisoned and impaired by their (gendered) cultural roles, their fictional family
members fail to play interpersonal roles to care for each other. Emotional bonding in
the family is difficult and the family becomes the site for suffering.