Abstract:
This is a case study of the political economy of institutionalizing private enterprises in
Jilin region, Jilin Province, Northeast China during 1994-2008. This study is
contextualized in a larger constellation of national/provincial institutions and policies.
It examines changes in the institutions governing private enterprises at the local level,
and shows how the policies and actions of the central/provincial state have caused
Iocal-Ievel political economic institutional changes, which in turn created incentives
and constraints that shaped the behaviour of local state officials; and how, in the
backdrop of changing central-local relationship along with China’s economic
transformation, the actions of local state officials have shaped local adaptive informal
institutions which, with repetition and diffusion, took on an institutional reality of
their own, and at Iast resulted in the change of formal institutions at
national/provincial level.
This study is constructed upon the empirical evidence from both Chinese and Western
scholarship, quantitative data from published and unpublished official documents and
statistical figures, and the qualitative data from interviews in the field site. The New
Institutional Economics QSlIE) approaches are used to examine the development of
private enterprises from the relation of transaction cost and institutional change in
China’s political economy, Susan Whiting’s model (2001) is applied to the analysis of
how institutions affect local private enterprise development, and how the development
of private enterprises induces institutional changes, and Susan Shirk’s framework
(1993) is employed to analyse how the power of the central government is constrained
by local factors within the institutional arrangements of central-local relations, and
how local political and economic innovations could contribute to the change of
national political and policy change for private sector development.
The central contention of the thesis is that (1) the interaction between
national/provincial political and policy changes, the innovation of local political and
economic institutions, and grassroots state and non-state actors, has shaped decisively
the development of private enterprises in Jilin between 1994 and 2008; (2) due to the
differences in local political and economic institutional arrangements, the model of
private enterprise development varies significantly from one locality to another; and
(3) to accommodate the development of local private enterprises, local political and
economic institutional changes occurred, and these changes have contributed to the
change of national/provincial political and policy environment for private sector
development.