dc.contributor.author |
Signal Nada Elizabeth June |
|
dc.contributor.author |
McLaren Ruth |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Rashid Usman |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Vandal Alain |
|
dc.contributor.author |
King Marcus |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Almesfer Faisal |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Henderson Jeanette |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Taylor Denise |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2020-11-11T19:29:02Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2020-11-11T19:29:02Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2020-7-29 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
JMIR mHealth and uHealth 8(7):e17036 29 Jul 2020 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2291-5222 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/2292/53527 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
BACKGROUND:As many as 80% of stroke survivors experience upper limb (UL) disability. The strong relationships between disability, lost productivity, and ongoing health care costs mean reducing disability after stroke is critical at both individual and society levels. Unfortunately, the amount of UL-focused rehabilitation received by people with stroke is extremely low. Activity monitoring and promotion using wearable devices offer a potential technology-based solution to address this gap. Commonly, wearable devices are used to deliver a haptic nudge to the wearer with the aim of promoting a particular behavior. However, little is known about the effectiveness of haptic nudging in promoting behaviors in patient populations. OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to estimate the effect of haptic nudging delivered via a wrist-worn wearable device on UL movement in people with UL disability following stroke undertaking inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS:A multiple-period randomized crossover design was used to measure the association of UL movement with the occurrence of haptic nudge reminders to move the affected UL in 20 people with stroke undertaking inpatient rehabilitation. UL movement was observed and classified using movement taxonomy across 72 one-minute observation periods from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM on a single weekday. On 36 occasions, a haptic nudge to move the affected UL was provided just before the observation period. On the other 36 occasions, no haptic nudge was given. The timing of the haptic nudge was randomized across the observation period for each participant. Statistical analysis was performed using mixed logistic regression. The effect of a haptic nudge was evaluated from the intention-to-treat dataset as the ratio of the odds of affected UL movement during the observation period following a "Planned Nudge" to the odds of affected limb movement during the observation period following "No Nudge." RESULTS:The primary intention-to-treat analysis showed the odds ratio (OR) of affected UL movement following a haptic nudge was 1.44 (95% CI 1.28-1.63, P<.001). The secondary analysis revealed an increased odds of affected UL movement following a Planned Nudge was predominantly due to increased odds of spontaneous affected UL movement (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.65-2.51, P<.001) rather than affected UL movement in conjunction with unaffected UL movement (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.99-1.29, P=.07). CONCLUSIONS:Haptic nudging delivered via a wrist-worn wearable device increases affected UL movement in people with UL disability following stroke undertaking inpatient rehabilitation. The promoted movement appears to be specific to the instructions given. TRIAL REGISTRATION:Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry 12616000654459; https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=370687&isReview=true. |
|
dc.format.medium |
Electronic |
|
dc.language |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC |
|
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
JMIR mHealth and uHealth |
|
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
|
dc.subject |
1109 Neurosciences |
|
dc.subject |
Clinical |
|
dc.subject |
Clinical Medicine and Science |
|
dc.subject |
Rehabilitation |
|
dc.subject |
Stroke |
|
dc.subject |
Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities |
|
dc.subject |
Clinical Research |
|
dc.subject |
Stroke |
|
dc.subject |
Science & Technology |
|
dc.subject |
Life Sciences & Biomedicine |
|
dc.subject |
Health Care Sciences & Services |
|
dc.subject |
Medical Informatics |
|
dc.subject |
stroke |
|
dc.subject |
rehabilitation |
|
dc.subject |
physical activity |
|
dc.subject |
movement |
|
dc.subject |
disability |
|
dc.subject |
technology |
|
dc.subject |
upper limb |
|
dc.subject |
wearable |
|
dc.subject |
haptic |
|
dc.subject |
nudge |
|
dc.subject |
PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY |
|
dc.subject |
THERAPY |
|
dc.subject |
CLASSIFICATION |
|
dc.subject |
TECHNOLOGY |
|
dc.subject |
DISABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
USABILITY |
|
dc.subject |
RECOVERY |
|
dc.subject |
BEHAVIOR |
|
dc.subject |
DEVICES |
|
dc.subject |
COSTS |
|
dc.title |
Haptic Nudges Increase Affected Upper Limb Movement During Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation: Multiple-Period Randomized Crossover Study. |
|
dc.type |
Journal Article |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
10.2196/17036 |
|
pubs.issue |
7 |
|
pubs.begin-page |
e17036 |
|
pubs.volume |
8 |
|
dc.date.updated |
2020-10-15T02:27:48Z |
|
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: The authors |
en |
pubs.author-url |
http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000555923400001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=6e41486220adb198d0efde5a3b153e7d |
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
|
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
research-article |
|
pubs.subtype |
Journal Article |
|
pubs.elements-id |
809460 |
|
dc.identifier.eissn |
2291-5222 |
|
pubs.number |
ARTN e17036 |
|