Clinical performance of decellularized heart valves versus standard tissue conduits: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Waqanivavalagi SWFR
dc.contributor.author Bhat S
dc.contributor.author Ground MB
dc.contributor.author Milsom PF
dc.contributor.author Cornish J
dc.date.accessioned 2020-11-23T02:33:33Z
dc.date.available 2020-11-23T02:33:33Z
dc.date.issued 2020-9-18
dc.identifier.citation Journal of cardiothoracic surgery 15(1):260 18 Sep 2020
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/53663
dc.description.abstract BACKGROUND: Valve replacement surgery is the definitive management strategy for patients with severe valvular disease. However, valvular conduits currently in clinical use are associated with significant limitations. Tissue-engineered (decellularized) heart valves are alternative prostheses that have demonstrated promising early results. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to perform robust evaluation of the clinical performance of decellularized heart valves implanted in either outflow tract position, in comparison with standard tissue conduits. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for articles in which outcomes between decellularized heart valves surgically implanted within either outflow tract position of human subjects and standard tissue conduits were compared. Primary endpoints included postoperative mortality and reoperation rates. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model via the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Seventeen articles were identified, of which 16 were included in the meta-analysis. In total, 1418 patients underwent outflow tract reconstructions with decellularized heart valves and 2725 patients received standard tissue conduits. Decellularized heart valves were produced from human pulmonary valves and implanted within the right ventricular outflow tract in all cases. Lower postoperative mortality (4.7% vs. 6.1%; RR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.60-1.47; P = 0.77) and reoperation rates (4.8% vs. 7.4%; RR 0.55, 95% CI: 0.36-0.84; P = 0.0057) were observed in patients with decellularized heart valves, although only reoperation rates were statistically significant. There was no statistically significant heterogeneity between the analyzed articles (I2 = 31%, P = 0.13 and I2 = 33%, P = 0.10 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Decellularized heart valves implanted within the right ventricular outflow tract have demonstrated significantly lower reoperation rates when compared to standard tissue conduits. However, in order to allow for more accurate conclusions about the clinical performance of decellularized heart valves to be made, there need to be more high-quality studies with greater consistency in the reporting of clinical outcomes.
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of cardiothoracic surgery
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject 1103 Clinical Sciences
dc.title Clinical performance of decellularized heart valves versus standard tissue conduits: a systematic review and meta-analysis
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1186/s13019-020-01292-y
pubs.issue 1
pubs.begin-page 260
pubs.volume 15
dc.date.updated 2020-10-08T21:31:23Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The authors en
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Review
pubs.subtype Journal
pubs.elements-id 817619
dc.identifier.eissn 1749-8090


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics