Encouraging interprofessional collaboration: The effects of clinical protocols.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Barrow, Mark J
dc.contributor.author Gasquoine, Susan E
dc.coverage.spatial England
dc.date.accessioned 2020-12-08T01:45:57Z
dc.date.available 2020-12-08T01:45:57Z
dc.date.issued 2018-10
dc.identifier.issn 0962-1067
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/53782
dc.description.abstract AIMS AND OBJECTIVES:To consider the characteristics of protocol documents themselves as a factor influencing the nature of care delivery and their potential to facilitate greater interprofessional collaboration. BACKGROUND:Healthcare guidelines and clinical protocols provide important guidance and direction to health professionals in their delivery of care. By detailing requirements and actions to be taken in specified circumstances or contexts, these documents may facilitate a broadening of the pool of people able to deliver care. DESIGN:Critical reading of four clinical protocols representing the range of protocol types in use was carried out to consider the extent to which the documentation of guidelines and protocols and the documents themselves might be considered as vehicles for increased collaboration in health care. METHODS:A "close reading" rubric was developed directing the researcher to look for evidence in each protocol of the following: authorship, person or group responsible for the protocol's development; stated document purpose; target readers, either stated or implied; the particular subjects, the document names and the objects created by them such as care pathways; the use of specific terminology and imagery, the documents' form and structure; and evidence of intertextuality referring to other documents, for example legislation or policy statements. Tabulation of the coding analysis is presented. RESULTS:Nurses were the only professional group named in the documents as assignees or subjects. "Patients" and "care" are the objects created, and the scientific-biomedical discourse with its associated procedural language was dominant. CONCLUSIONS:Many protocols have been developed to standardise practice and increase the effectiveness of teamwork. They may, however, constrain collaboration in healthcare settings because they diminish a nursing "voice" and create the expectation that nurses alone work across the spectrum of protocols. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE:An unintended consequence of the global use of clinical protocols and guidelines to support safe and efficient healthcare delivery may be to reduce interprofessional collaboration.
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Wiley
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of clinical nursing
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Clinical Protocols
dc.subject Attitude of Health Personnel
dc.subject Cooperative Behavior
dc.subject Interprofessional Relations
dc.subject Delivery of Health Care
dc.subject Intersectoral Collaboration
dc.subject New Zealand
dc.subject clinical guidelines
dc.subject discourse analysis
dc.subject interdisciplinary health team
dc.subject nurses
dc.subject patient care
dc.subject standard of care
dc.subject Attitude of Health Personnel
dc.subject Clinical Protocols
dc.subject Cooperative Behavior
dc.subject Delivery of Health Care
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Interprofessional Relations
dc.subject Intersectoral Collaboration
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Nursing
dc.subject clinical guidelines
dc.subject discourse analysis
dc.subject interdisciplinary health team
dc.subject New Zealand
dc.subject nurses
dc.subject patient care
dc.subject standard of care
dc.subject CARE
dc.subject COMMUNICATION
dc.subject GUIDELINES
dc.subject LEADERSHIP
dc.subject US
dc.subject 1117 Public Health and Health Services
dc.subject Health services & systems
dc.subject Health Services Research
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Health Services
dc.subject Generic Health Relevance
dc.subject 1110 Nursing
dc.subject 1117 Public Health and Health Services
dc.subject 1701 Psychology
dc.title Encouraging interprofessional collaboration: The effects of clinical protocols.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/jocn.14591
pubs.issue 19-20
pubs.begin-page 3482
pubs.volume 27
dc.date.updated 2020-11-26T18:59:34Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29964305
pubs.end-page 3489
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 753489
dc.identifier.eissn 1365-2702
pubs.online-publication-date 2018-7-24


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics