DOHaD in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review exploring gaps in DOHaD population studies.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Tu'akoi, Siobhan
dc.contributor.author Vickers, Mark H
dc.contributor.author Bay, Jacquie L
dc.date.accessioned 2020-12-09T01:11:30Z
dc.date.available 2020-12-09T01:11:30Z
dc.date.issued 2020-4-21
dc.identifier.issn 2040-1744
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2292/53966
dc.description.abstract Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately affected by non-communicable diseases (NCDs), accounting for more than 80% of NCD-related deaths globally. Research into early-life influences on these diseases via the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) paradigm has informed health promotion interventions and policies focused on optimising early-life health. However, little is known about where this research occurs and whether it reaches and reflects the countries most affected by NCDs. This review searched for DOHaD studies that investigated relationships between factors during pregnancy and at birth, with later-life NCD incidence, risk and related mortality. The aim of this review was to identify where DOHaD research has been conducted and whether this focus is appropriate and relevant, given the differential burden of NCDs. Embase, MEDLINE and Scopus were searched, and eligibility screening processes identified 136 final articles. This review found that 49.7% of DOHaD research was conducted on populations within Western Europe, 15.9% in East Asia, 12.7% in North America, 8.3% in Latin America and the Caribbean, and fewer in Australasia, South Asia, the Middle East, the Africas, and Central Asia. When categorised by income, this review found that 76.4% of studies were based in high-income countries, 19.1% in upper-middle-income and 4.5% in lower-middle-income countries. No studies were based in low-income countries. There is therefore a marked disconnect between where DOHaD research is undertaken and where the greatest NCD disease burden exists. Increasing DOHaD research capacity in LMICs is crucial to informing local strategies that can contribute to reducing the incidence of NCDs.
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Cambridge University Press (CUP)
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of developmental origins of health and disease
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject 1117 Public Health and Health Services
dc.subject Population & Society
dc.subject Public Health
dc.subject Prevention
dc.subject Cardiovascular
dc.subject 11 Medical and Health Sciences
dc.title DOHaD in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review exploring gaps in DOHaD population studies.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1017/s2040174420000276
pubs.begin-page 1
dc.date.updated 2020-11-08T23:13:31Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.end-page 7
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 799201
dc.identifier.eissn 2040-1752
pubs.online-publication-date 2020-4-21


Files in this item

There are no files associated with this item.

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics