How do Undergraduates Perceive the Use of Assessment? A Study in Higher Education

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Pereira, D
dc.contributor.author Cadime, I
dc.contributor.author Brown, Gavin
dc.contributor.author Flores, MA
dc.date.accessioned 2021-01-14T23:19:09Z
dc.date.available 2021-01-14T23:19:09Z
dc.date.issued 2021
dc.identifier.citation European Journal of Higher Education 12(1):1-17 02 Jan 2022
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/54262
dc.description.abstract Drawing upon a wider piece of research, this paper focuses on the validation of a “use of assessment” scale five Portuguese public universities with 5549 students. The study aims to investigate the psychometric properties of the scale; to describe how students look at assessment uses; to analyse their utility perceptions of assessment; and to understand their perspectives regarding participation in the assessment process. The scale demonstrated adequate validity and reliability based on factoral analysis of internal structure. Preference for alternative methods of assessment was negatively correlated with preference for traditional methods of assessment. However, preference for alternative methods was correlated with higher scores for assessment effectiveness, fairness and level of participation and engagement with assessment. On the contrary, preference for traditional methods was negatively correlated with perceived fairness and with engagement with assessment.
dc.relation.ispartofseries European Journal of Higher Education
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/research-impact/sharing-versions-of-journal-articles/
dc.title How do Undergraduates Perceive the Use of Assessment? A Study in Higher Education
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/21568235.2020.1871393
dc.date.updated 2020-12-16T19:49:14Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: Taylor & Francis en
pubs.publication-status Accepted
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Article
pubs.elements-id 832078


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics