dc.contributor.author |
Taylor, Tracy L |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Hamm, Jeff P |
|
dc.coverage.spatial |
United States |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-04-20T01:49:17Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-04-20T01:49:17Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021-1-6 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1943-3921 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/2292/54928 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
This study embedded attentional cues in the study phase of an item-method directed forgetting task. We used an unpredictive onset cue (Experiment 1), a predictive onset cue (Experiment 2), or a predictive central cue (Experiments 3-6) to direct attention to the left or right. In Experiments 1-5, this was followed by a pink or blue study word that required a speeded colour discrimination; in Experiment 6, it was followed by a pink or blue word or nonword that required a lexical decision. Each study word was followed by an instruction to Remember or Forget. A yes-no recognition test confirmed better recognition of to-be-remembered words than to-be-forgotten words; a cueing effect confirmed the effectiveness of predictive cues in allocating attentional resources. There was, however, no evidence that the directed forgetting effect differed for attended and unattended words: Encoding depends more on the memory intention formed after a study word has disappeared than on the availability of processing resources when that word first appears. |
|
dc.format.medium |
Print-Electronic |
|
dc.language |
eng |
|
dc.publisher |
Springer Science and Business Media LLC |
|
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
Attention, perception & psychophysics |
|
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher. |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
|
dc.subject |
Attention |
|
dc.subject |
Encoding |
|
dc.subject |
Intentional forgetting |
|
dc.subject |
Item-method directed forgetting |
|
dc.subject |
Social Sciences |
|
dc.subject |
Psychology |
|
dc.subject |
Psychology, Experimental |
|
dc.subject |
Item-method directed forgetting |
|
dc.subject |
Intentional forgetting |
|
dc.subject |
Attention |
|
dc.subject |
Encoding |
|
dc.subject |
DOWN SEARCH STRATEGIES |
|
dc.subject |
DIVIDED ATTENTION |
|
dc.subject |
VISUAL-ATTENTION |
|
dc.subject |
SPATIAL ATTENTION |
|
dc.subject |
REMEMBER |
|
dc.subject |
MEMORY |
|
dc.subject |
INHIBITION |
|
dc.subject |
INSTRUCTIONS |
|
dc.subject |
MECHANISMS |
|
dc.subject |
WITHDRAWAL |
|
dc.subject |
1701 Psychology |
|
dc.subject |
1702 Cognitive Sciences |
|
dc.title |
Intention matters more than attention: Item-method directed forgetting of items at attended and unattended locations. |
|
dc.type |
Journal Article |
|
dc.identifier.doi |
10.3758/s13414-020-02220-x |
|
pubs.begin-page |
1 |
|
dc.date.updated |
2021-03-29T21:09:19Z |
|
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: The author |
en |
pubs.author-url |
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409904 |
|
pubs.end-page |
23 |
|
pubs.publication-status |
Published |
|
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess |
en |
pubs.subtype |
research-article |
|
pubs.subtype |
Journal Article |
|
pubs.elements-id |
835533 |
|
dc.identifier.eissn |
1943-393X |
|
dc.identifier.pii |
10.3758/s13414-020-02220-x |
|
pubs.online-publication-date |
2021-1-6 |
|