dc.contributor.advisor |
Roy, Rajshri |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Malloy, Jessica A |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-05-17T20:16:34Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-05-17T20:16:34Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/2292/55104 |
|
dc.description |
Full Text is available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland only. |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
Background - The ‘digital food environment’ is quickly emerging and altering traditional food
availability and consumption. Research into the digital food environment, including online
food delivery (OFD) and digital food marketing and promotion, is limited due to its rapid
evolution and proliferation. To date, little is known of its influence on dietary quality and
nutrition status. This cross-sectional analysis is one arm of a multi-city study, which is the first
to examine the nutrition quality of a market-leading (OFD) service (Uber Eats) in Auckland,
New Zealand.
Methodology - Using publicly available population-level data, Auckland was identified as a
geographical area with an above-average (>30%) population of youth (15-34-years). Sixty-one
percent of Auckland council suburbs have the Uber Eats service available (n = 186). A
standardised protocol was used to collect data on the most popular food outlets, and most
popular menu items, for each identified suburb. Each outlet identified (n = 394) was categorised
as unhealthy, less healthy or healthy using the Food Environment Scoring (FES) tool (range; -
10 ‘unhealthiest’ to 10 ‘healthiest’). Each menu item identified (n = 2421) was classified as
either discretionary or core using the ABS Discretionary Food List of 2014. Data on
geographical distances between food outlets and suburbs, and levels of deprivation was
collected to ascertain associations between socio-economic status and service offerings and
usage.
Results - Almost three-quarters of food outlets assessed (73.6%) were classified as unhealthy,
with less than 5% (4.3%) of outlets classified as healthy, using the FES. The majority of menu
items (88.2%) evaluated were classed as discretionary foods. Significant associations were
observed between the healthiness of food outlets (using the FES) and deprivation levels of food
outlet locations (p = <0.0277). No significant differences were observed between the number
of discretionary foods available and deprivation level (p = 0.0748).
Conclusion - This study found that most of the popular outlets on Uber Eats are unhealthy,
with the majority of popular menu items being discretionary. More research is required to
further explore the nutrition consequences of the service, including direct links to increases in
discretionary food consumption and, consequentially, rates of non-communicable disease
(NCD). |
|
dc.publisher |
ResearchSpace@Auckland |
en |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Masters Thesis - University of Auckland |
en |
dc.relation.isreferencedby |
UoA |
en |
dc.rights |
Restricted Item. Full Text is available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland only. |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.title |
The Intersection of Tech & Nutrition: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Uber Eats, Auckland, NZ |
|
dc.type |
Thesis |
en |
thesis.degree.discipline |
Nutrition & Dietetics |
|
thesis.degree.grantor |
The University of Auckland |
en |
thesis.degree.level |
Masters |
en |
dc.date.updated |
2021-05-10T20:07:23Z |
|
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: the author |
en |
dc.identifier.wikidata |
Q112956011 |
|