dc.contributor.advisor |
Jones, Campbell |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Castano Gallego, Julian A |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2021-08-25T02:45:45Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2021-08-25T02:45:45Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2021 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://hdl.handle.net/2292/56144 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
The aim of this thesis is to understand how individualism became cemented in contemporary
philosophical, political, economic and moral thought. Understanding where exactly the locus
is, we can attempt to dismantle it once and for all so that a site can be created to construct
relational spaces where both ourselves and the world can flourish. This thesis identifies two
different trajectories that originate in the Enlightenment in terms of thinking through the
theory of the subject, the self or the individual: the subject as insular on the one hand and as
collective on the other. The first trajectory presents the subject as dematerialised and
informed by the division between subject and objects but also between subjects. As such the
subject can only relate in the negative, that is, the subject returning to itself in order to
represent the other. Here the early modern subject and its liberal offspring are presented. The
second trajectory evidences the deep relationality from which the subject is constituted, here,
transindividuality finds its heightened expression through Spinoza’s dismantling of this first
trajectory. This second trajectory emphasises on the interconnection between subject and
objects that are nonetheless obscured in our current epoch and also argues that in order for
relations and the world to flourish, we need to move beyond the capitalist mode of
production. This project argues for the later trajectory and against the former but also
attempts to show how the former has become the fulcrum from which liberal theories stem
today. Once these two trajectories are clearly drawn, they will be intersected in the last two
chapters of this thesis, in theory and practice, in order to evidence that liberal conceptions of
justice are unable to provide a stable solution to local and global issues and to intimate how a
transindividual interpretation not only helps in bringing these issues to light but provide a
conceptual and practical opening for radical change. Through transindividuality we therefore
can evidence the alienation that obscures the relations of subjects to objects and to other
people, relations that constantly obtain under the current mode of production which liberal
political and economic positions obscure through the figure of the individual. |
|
dc.publisher |
ResearchSpace@Auckland |
en |
dc.relation.ispartof |
Masters Thesis - University of Auckland |
en |
dc.relation.isreferencedby |
UoA |
en |
dc.rights |
Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. |
|
dc.rights.uri |
https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm |
en |
dc.rights.uri |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/nz/ |
|
dc.title |
Against Liberalism: The Social and Political Consequences of the Theory of the Subject |
|
dc.type |
Thesis |
en |
thesis.degree.discipline |
Politics and International Relations |
|
thesis.degree.grantor |
The University of Auckland |
en |
thesis.degree.level |
Masters |
en |
dc.date.updated |
2021-06-24T05:35:30Z |
|
dc.rights.holder |
Copyright: the author |
en |
dc.rights.accessrights |
http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess |
en |
dc.identifier.wikidata |
Q112954941 |
|