Monthly High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation and Cancer Risk: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Vitamin D Assessment Randomized Clinical Trial.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Scragg, Robert
dc.contributor.author Khaw, Kay-Tee
dc.contributor.author Toop, Les
dc.contributor.author Sluyter, John
dc.contributor.author Lawes, Carlene MM
dc.contributor.author Waayer, Debbie
dc.contributor.author Giovannucci, Edward
dc.contributor.author Camargo, Carlos A
dc.coverage.spatial United States
dc.date.accessioned 2021-09-12T22:33:21Z
dc.date.available 2021-09-12T22:33:21Z
dc.date.issued 2018-11-8
dc.identifier.issn 2374-2437
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/56506
dc.description.abstract <h4>Importance</h4>Previous randomized clinical trials have reported inconsistent results on the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cancer incidence.<h4>Objective</h4>To examine whether high-dose vitamin D supplementation received monthly, without calcium, is associated with a reduction in cancer incidence and cancer mortality in the general population.<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>This is a post hoc analysis of data from the Vitamin D Assessment (ViDA) study, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that recruited participants from family practices and community groups in Auckland, New Zealand, from April 5, 2011, through November 6, 2012, with follow-up completed December 31, 2015. Participants were adult community residents aged 50 to 84 years. Of 47 905 adults invited from family practices and 163 from community groups, 5110 participants were randomized to receive vitamin D3 (n = 2558) or placebo (n = 2552). Two participants withdrew consent, and all others (n = 5108) were included in the primary analysis. Data analysis was by intention to treat.<h4>Interventions</h4>Oral vitamin D3, in an initial bolus dose of 200 000 IU and followed by monthly doses of 100 000 IU, or placebo for a median of 3.3 years (range, 2.5-4.2 years).<h4>Main outcomes and measures</h4>Post hoc primary outcome was the number of all primary invasive and in situ malignant neoplasms (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers) diagnosed from randomization until the study medication was discontinued on July 31, 2015.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 5108 participants included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 65.9 (8.3) years, 58.1% were male, and 4253 (83.3%) were of European or another race/ethnicity, with the remainder being Polynesian or South Asian. Mean (SD) baseline deseasonalized 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was 26.5 (9.0) ng/mL. In a random sample of 438 participants, the mean follow-up 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration consistently was greater than 20 ng/mL higher in the vitamin D group than in the placebo group. The primary outcome of cancer comprised 328 total cases of cancer (259 invasive and 69 in situ malignant neoplasms) and occurred in 165 of 2558 participants (6.5%) in the vitamin D group and 163 of 2550 (6.4%) in the placebo group, yielding an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.81-1.25; P = .95).<h4>Conclusions and relevance</h4>High-dose vitamin D supplementation prescribed monthly for up to 4 years without calcium may not prevent cancer. This study suggests that daily or weekly dosing for a longer period may require further study.<h4>Trial registration</h4>anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12611000402943.
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher American Medical Association (AMA)
dc.relation.ispartofseries JAMA oncology
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Neoplasms
dc.subject Vitamin D
dc.subject Incidence
dc.subject Double-Blind Method
dc.subject Time Factors
dc.subject Dietary Supplements
dc.subject Aged
dc.subject Aged, 80 and over
dc.subject Middle Aged
dc.subject Female
dc.subject Male
dc.subject Aged
dc.subject Aged, 80 and over
dc.subject Dietary Supplements
dc.subject Double-Blind Method
dc.subject Female
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Incidence
dc.subject Male
dc.subject Middle Aged
dc.subject Neoplasms
dc.subject Time Factors
dc.subject Vitamin D
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Oncology
dc.subject 3RD NATIONAL-HEALTH
dc.subject SERUM 25-HYDROXYVITAMIN-D
dc.subject CALCIUM SUPPLEMENTATION
dc.subject MORTALITY
dc.subject COLON
dc.subject METAANALYSIS
dc.subject ETHNICITY
dc.subject COMMUNITY
dc.subject SUNLIGHT
dc.subject SINGLE
dc.subject 1117 Public Health and Health Services
dc.subject Clinical
dc.subject Public Health
dc.subject Cancer
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Complementary and Alternative Medicine
dc.subject Nutrition
dc.subject Prevention
dc.subject Clinical Trials and Supportive Activities
dc.subject Cancer
dc.subject 6.1 Pharmaceuticals
dc.subject 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
dc.subject 1117 Public Health and Health Services
dc.title Monthly High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation and Cancer Risk: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Vitamin D Assessment Randomized Clinical Trial.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2178
pubs.issue 11
pubs.begin-page e182178
pubs.volume 4
dc.date.updated 2021-08-19T03:34:50Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30027269
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype research-article
pubs.subtype Randomized Controlled Trial
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 757112
dc.identifier.eissn 2374-2445
dc.identifier.pii 2687971
pubs.number ARTN e182178


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics