Unilateral Cochlear Implants for Severe, Profound, or Moderate Sloping to Profound Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Consensus Statements.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Buchman, Craig A
dc.contributor.author Gifford, René H
dc.contributor.author Haynes, David S
dc.contributor.author Lenarz, Thomas
dc.contributor.author O'Donoghue, Gerard
dc.contributor.author Adunka, Oliver
dc.contributor.author Biever, Allison
dc.contributor.author Briggs, Robert J
dc.contributor.author Carlson, Matthew L
dc.contributor.author Dai, Pu
dc.contributor.author Driscoll, Colin L
dc.contributor.author Francis, Howard W
dc.contributor.author Gantz, Bruce J
dc.contributor.author Gurgel, Richard K
dc.contributor.author Hansen, Marlan R
dc.contributor.author Holcomb, Meredith
dc.contributor.author Karltorp, Eva
dc.contributor.author Kirtane, Milind
dc.contributor.author Larky, Jannine
dc.contributor.author Mylanus, Emmanuel AM
dc.contributor.author Roland, J Thomas
dc.contributor.author Saeed, Shakeel R
dc.contributor.author Skarzynski, Henryk
dc.contributor.author Skarzynski, Piotr H
dc.contributor.author Syms, Mark
dc.contributor.author Teagle, Holly
dc.contributor.author Van de Heyning, Paul H
dc.contributor.author Vincent, Christophe
dc.contributor.author Wu, Hao
dc.contributor.author Yamasoba, Tatsuya
dc.contributor.author Zwolan, Terry
dc.coverage.spatial United States
dc.date.accessioned 2021-09-12T22:36:52Z
dc.date.available 2021-09-12T22:36:52Z
dc.date.issued 2020-10
dc.identifier.issn 2168-6181
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/56507
dc.description.abstract <h4>Importance</h4>Cochlear implants are a treatment option for individuals with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who receive little or no benefit from hearing aids; however, cochlear implantation in adults is still not routine.<h4>Objective</h4>To develop consensus statements regarding the use of unilateral cochlear implants in adults with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral SNHL.<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>This study was a modified Delphi consensus process that was informed by a systematic review of the literature and clinical expertise. Searches were conducted in the following databases: (1) MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Ovid MEDLINE, (2) Embase, and (3) the Cochrane Library. Consensus statements on cochlear implantation were developed using the evidence identified. This consensus process was relevant for the use of unilateral cochlear implantation in adults with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral SNHL. The literature searches were conducted on July 18, 2018, and the 3-step Delphi consensus method took place over the subsequent 9-month period up to March 30, 2019.<h4>Main outcomes and measures</h4>A Delphi consensus panel of 30 international specialists voted on consensus statements about cochlear implantation, informed by an SR of the literature and clinical expertise. This vote resulted in 20 evidence-based consensus statements that are in line with clinical experience. A modified 3-step Delphi consensus method was used to vote on and refine the consensus statements. This method consisted of 2 rounds of email questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting of panel members at the final round. All consensus statements were reviewed, discussed, and finalized at the face-to-face meeting.<h4>Results</h4>In total, 6492 articles were identified in the searches of the electronic databases. After removal of duplicate articles, 74 articles fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria and were used to create the 20 evidence-based consensus statements. These 20 consensus statements on the use of unilateral cochlear implantation in adults with SNHL were relevant to the following 7 key areas of interest: level of awareness of cochlear implantation (1 consensus statement); best practice clinical pathway from diagnosis to surgery (3 consensus statements); best practice guidelines for surgery (2 consensus statements); clinical effectiveness of cochlear implantation (4 consensus statements); factors associated with postimplantation outcomes (4 consensus statements); association between hearing loss and depression, cognition, and dementia (5 consensus statements); and cost implications of cochlear implantation (1 consensus statement).<h4>Conclusions and relevance</h4>These consensus statements represent the first step toward the development of international guidelines on best practices for cochlear implantation in adults with SNHL. Further research to develop consensus statements for unilateral cochlear implantation in children, bilateral cochlear implantation, combined electric-acoustic stimulation, unilateral cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness, and asymmetrical hearing loss in children and adults may be beneficial for optimizing hearing and quality of life for these patients.
dc.format.medium Print
dc.language eng
dc.publisher American Medical Association (AMA)
dc.relation.ispartofseries JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Hearing Loss, Bilateral
dc.subject Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
dc.subject Cochlear Implantation
dc.subject Severity of Illness Index
dc.subject Hearing Aids
dc.subject Consensus
dc.subject Speech Perception
dc.subject Hearing
dc.subject Quality of Life
dc.subject Cochlear Implantation
dc.subject Consensus
dc.subject Hearing
dc.subject Hearing Aids
dc.subject Hearing Loss, Bilateral
dc.subject Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Quality of Life
dc.subject Severity of Illness Index
dc.subject Speech Perception
dc.title Unilateral Cochlear Implants for Severe, Profound, or Moderate Sloping to Profound Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Consensus Statements.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0998
pubs.issue 10
pubs.begin-page 942
pubs.volume 146
dc.date.updated 2021-08-14T00:56:18Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32857157
pubs.end-page 953
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
pubs.subtype Systematic Review
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 823669
dc.identifier.eissn 2168-619X
dc.identifier.pii 2769941


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics