Assemblage of Focal Species Recognizers-AFSR: A technique for decreasing false indications of presence from acoustic automatic identification in a multiple species context.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Campos, Ivan Braga
dc.contributor.author Landers, Todd J
dc.contributor.author Lee, Kate D
dc.contributor.author Lee, William George
dc.contributor.author Friesen, Megan R
dc.contributor.author Gaskett, Anne C
dc.contributor.author Ranjard, Louis
dc.coverage.spatial United States
dc.date.accessioned 2021-09-13T23:23:28Z
dc.date.available 2021-09-13T23:23:28Z
dc.date.issued 2019-1
dc.identifier.citation PloS one 14(12):e0212727 Jan 2019
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/56532
dc.description.abstract Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) coupled with automated species identification is a promising tool for species monitoring and conservation worldwide. However, high false indications of presence are still an important limitation and a crucial factor for acceptance of these techniques in wildlife surveys. Here we present the Assemblage of Focal Species Recognizers-AFSR, a novel approach for decreasing false positives and increasing models' precision in multispecies contexts. AFSR focusses on decreasing false positives by excluding unreliable sound file segments that are prone to misidentification. We used MatlabHTK, a hidden Markov models interface for bioacoustics analyses, for illustrating AFSR technique by comparing two approaches, 1) a multispecies recognizer where all species are identified simultaneously, and 2) an assemblage of focal species recognizers (AFSR), where several recognizers that each prioritise a single focal species are then summarised into a single output, according to a set of rules designed to exclude unreliable segments. Both approaches (the multispecies recognizer and AFSR) used the same sound files training dataset, but different processing workflow. We applied these recognisers to PAM recordings from a remote island colony with five seabird species and compared their outputs with manual species identifications. False positives and precision improved for all the five species when using AFSR, achieving remarkable 0% false positives and 100% precision for three of five seabird species, and < 6% false positives, and >90% precision for the other two species. AFSR' output was also used to generate daily calling activity patterns for each species. Instead of attempting to withdraw useful information from every fragment in a sound recording, AFSR prioritises more trustworthy information from sections with better quality data. AFSR can be applied to automated species identification from multispecies PAM recordings worldwide.
dc.format.medium Electronic-eCollection
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
dc.relation.ispartofseries PloS one
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject Animals
dc.subject Birds
dc.subject Species Specificity
dc.subject Acoustics
dc.subject Automation
dc.subject New Zealand
dc.subject Biological Monitoring
dc.subject Acoustics
dc.subject Animals
dc.subject Automation
dc.subject Biological Monitoring
dc.subject Birds
dc.subject New Zealand
dc.subject Species Specificity
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Multidisciplinary Sciences
dc.subject Science & Technology - Other Topics
dc.subject VOCAL ACTIVITY
dc.subject SEABIRD
dc.subject CLASSIFICATION
dc.subject BIODIVERSITY
dc.subject CALLS
dc.subject 0801 Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing
dc.title Assemblage of Focal Species Recognizers-AFSR: A technique for decreasing false indications of presence from acoustic automatic identification in a multiple species context.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0212727
pubs.issue 12
pubs.begin-page e0212727
pubs.volume 14
dc.date.updated 2021-08-07T05:04:59Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31805054
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
pubs.subtype research-article
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 790131
dc.identifier.eissn 1932-6203
dc.identifier.pii PONE-D-19-03689
pubs.number ARTN e0212727
pubs.online-publication-date 2019-12-5


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics