Seabird bycatch risk correlates with body size, and relatively larger skulls, bills, wings and sensory structures

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Heswall, AM
dc.contributor.author Friesen, MR
dc.contributor.author Martin, AL Brunton
dc.contributor.author Gaskett, AC
dc.date.accessioned 2021-09-21T23:55:54Z
dc.date.available 2021-09-21T23:55:54Z
dc.date.issued 2021-4-23
dc.identifier.issn 0025-3162
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/56619
dc.description.abstract Many animals have sensory biases towards signals or cues that typically provide some fitness benefit. Sensory traps occur when other species or anthropogenic sources produce similar signals or cues but responding is no longer adaptive and can impose significant costs or even death. Bycatch of seabirds by fishing boats has devastating impacts, causing hundreds of thousands of seabird deaths per annum. Here, we explore whether fishing vessels are acting as a sensory trap, inadvertently targeting seabirds with certain life-history traits or larger skeletal or sensory structures. We surveyed the literature to compare seabird order, diet, wingspan, body size, and nesting preference (surface or burrow) of 70 seabirds with varying numbers of reported bycatch in one of the world’s most important regions for seabird breeding, in northern Aotearoa New Zealand. We also examined the skeletal and sensory measurements of six seabirds that co-occur spatially in this region, but have different numbers of reported bycatch and indices of bycatch risk. The literature survey revealed that the Charadriiformes and the Sphenisciformes were the most vulnerable groups (p = 0.01), especially to surface longline fisheries. There were no correlations with diet and foraging behaviour, but surface nesting seabirds and those with larger bodies and wingspans were at a greater risk of becoming bycatch. Skeletal measurements show that species with higher bycatch also have relatively larger skulls, bills and wings, eye sockets and nostrils (relative to body size) (p < 0.05). This suggests that having a larger overall body size and longer protruding body parts is a primary risk factor, but that species with relatively more sensitive sensory systems likely have even more acute bycatch risk. Considering fishing vessels as sensory traps provides a context to explore the multiple interconnecting factors of sensory sensitivity, sensory bias, behaviour and morphology.
dc.language en
dc.publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.ispartofseries Marine Biology
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Marine & Freshwater Biology
dc.subject 05 Environmental Sciences
dc.subject 06 Biological Sciences
dc.subject 07 Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
dc.title Seabird bycatch risk correlates with body size, and relatively larger skulls, bills, wings and sensory structures
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s00227-021-03873-4
pubs.issue 5
pubs.begin-page 70
pubs.volume 168
dc.date.updated 2021-08-07T04:57:28Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.author-url http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=WOS:000642914300001&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=6e41486220adb198d0efde5a3b153e7d
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RetrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Article
pubs.subtype Journal
pubs.elements-id 851560
dc.identifier.eissn 1432-1793
pubs.number 70
pubs.online-publication-date 2021-4-23


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics