The Consulship of 367 bc and the Evolution of Roman Military Authority*

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>A tension exists within the literary sources for early Rome, between the supposedly static nature of military authority, embodied by the grant of<jats:italic>imperium</jats:italic>which was allegedly shared both by archaic<jats:italic>reges</jats:italic>and republican magistrates, and the evidence for change within Rome’s military hierarchy, with the early republican army being commanded by a succession of different magistrates including the archaic<jats:italic>praetores</jats:italic>, the so-called ‘consular tribunes,’ and the finally the consuls and praetors of the mid-fourth century<jats:sc>BC</jats:sc>. The differences between the magistracies and the motivations driving the evolution of the system have caused confusion for both ancient and modern writers alike, with the usual debate being focused on the number of officials involved under each system and Rome’s expanding military and bureaucratic needs. The present study will argue that, far more than just varying in number, when viewed against the wider backdrop of Roman society during the period, the sources hint that the archaic<jats:italic>praetores</jats:italic>and consular tribunes might have exercised slightly different types of military authority – possibly distinguished by the designations<jats:italic>imperium</jats:italic>and<jats:italic>potestas</jats:italic>– which were unified under the office of the consulship of 367<jats:sc>BC</jats:sc>.<jats:sup>1</jats:sup>The changes in Rome’s military hierarchy during the fifth and fourth centuries<jats:sc>BC</jats:sc>may therefore not only indicate an expansion of Rome’s military command, as is usually argued, but also an evolution of military authority within Rome associated with the movement of power from the<jats:italic>comitia curiata</jats:italic>to the<jats:italic>comitia centuriata</jats:italic>.</jats:p>