Abstract:
Food is one of the few purchased products that becomes part of our body, therefore
consumers’ trust in food is critical to their food purchases. In the increasingly distanced food
supply chain, consumers have less control over their food and have to rely on other food chain
actors such as food regulators, retailers, and producers to build trust in their food. They also
often use food certification as a proxy for food quality and food safety to guide their food
purchase behaviour. This thesis is comprised of three papers which study consumer perceptions
of different food quality certification schemes in the larger context of the food chain system,
and the roles of these perceptions in consumers’ food choices. Data used in these papers were
collected using in-depth interviews with 27 Vietnamese participants who were comparable in
terms of their awareness of, their ability to afford, and their access to organic food.
The three papers are interrelated. Their connection lies in different dimensions of trust
in food that influence consumers’ food purchasing behaviour. The first paper focused on the
macro view of trust in the entire food system as the main driver for food purchases. The second
paper focuses on the elements that form the macro view, which are abstract trust in certification,
and interpersonal trust in food chain actors. The third paper focuses on individual certifications
to understand how food governance influences these elements of trust across three different
certification schemes.
Specifically, the first paper explores consumers’ motives and resistance of certified
organic food through understanding perceived consumption values of three different buyer
groups of organic food. An adaptive approach is used that draws on qualitative interview data
and consumption value theory to allow the main findings to evolve from both a theoretical
framework and from empirical evidence. The first paper advances research in organic food
consumption by showing that trust and distrust in the food system, a much wider concept than
trust in food labelling, is a determinant of consumption values of organic food, and therefore a
determinant of organic food choice. It also makes a valuable contribution to the organic
consumption values literature by showing a clear difference in the importance of perceived
consumption values across regular buyers, occasional buyers, and non-buyers of organic food.
Furthermore, the paper advances Sheth et al.’s (1991) theory of consumption values by
providing a more nuanced understanding of how consumption values can be interrelated.
The second paper uses the insights from the first paper and becomes more focused on
food certification, individual actors in the food chain, and trust. Specifically, it examines
consumers’ perception of food certification and how this perception influences and is
influenced by consumers’ trust in food chain actors. In doing so, the second paper extend the
literature on trust in food labelling through the inclusion of social-institutional factors in order
to understand variations in trust in food. Using social trust theory as a theoretical framework,
the paper shows organic food certification is perceived as a representation of the entire food
system. Therefore, its trustworthiness is dependent on consumer perceptions of the food
system’s capacity to guarantee organic standards along the entire food chain, which is a
manifestation of abstract trust. This paper contributes to the trust in food literature by showing
that general mistrust and uncertainty in the system may cause mistrust in mechanisms, such as
food labelling, that are designed to instil trust. It also extends trust theory by showing
interpersonal trust in food actors, such as retailers or growers, can compensate for a lack of
abstract trust in certification. Furthermore, the paper enhances our understanding of how
abstract distrust in the food system can influence trusting social relationships between people.
In this paper, a low level of abstract trust in a wider institutional system leads to distrust in the
way the entire food system operates, which in turn, weakens the trusting relationship between
consumers and food actors.
Lastly, the third paper further explores the differences and similarities of consumer trust
in three certifications in relation to consumer trust in the food system and food actors. These
schemes represent differences in type (community-based versus third-party) and origin
(international versus domestic certification). The paper extends literature in consumer trust in
certification by showing how consumers perceive international and domestic certifications, and
third-party and community-based certification, differently. Importantly, these differences are
significantly influenced by the perceived trustworthiness of food chain actors. It also makes a
valuable contribution to the literature by suggesting that consumers utilise their personal
relationships differently in purchasing certified vegetables under different certification
schemes. Furthermore, the paper extends the food trust literature by providing evidence for the
influence of food chain governance - the mechanisms linking growers to retailers - on consumer
trust in certified food.