Learning from the past & present: social science implications for COVID-19 immunity-based documentation

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Dada, Sara
dc.contributor.author Battles, Heather
dc.contributor.author Pilbeam, Caitlin
dc.contributor.author Singh, Bhagteshwar
dc.contributor.author Solomon, Tom
dc.contributor.author Gobat, Nina
dc.date.accessioned 2021-10-18T01:42:41Z
dc.date.available 2021-10-18T01:42:41Z
dc.date.issued 2021-12
dc.identifier.citation Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8(1):219 27 Sep 2021
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/57015
dc.description.abstract <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>In responding to the widespread impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, countries have proposed and implemented documentation policies that confer varying levels of freedoms or restrictions (e.g., ability to travel) based on individuals’ infection status or potential immunity. Most discussions around immunity- or infection-based documentation policies have focused on scientific plausibility, economic benefit, and challenges relating to ethics and equity. As COVID-19 vaccines are rolled out, attention has turned to confirmation of immunity and how documentation such as vaccine certificates or immunity passports can be implemented. However, the contextual inequities and local variabilities interacting with COVID-19 related documentation policies hinder a one-size-fits-all approach. In this Comment, we argue that social science perspectives can and should provide additional insight into these issues, through a diverse range of current and historical examples. This would enable policymakers and researchers to better understand and mitigate current and longer-term differential impacts of COVID-19 immunity-based documentation policies in different contexts. Furthermore, social science research methods can uniquely provide feedback to inform adjustments to policy implementation in real-time and help to document how these policy measures are felt differently across communities, populations, and countries, potentially for years to come. This Comment, updated as of 15 August 2021, combines precedents established in historical disease outbreaks and current experiences with COVID-19 immunity-based documentation policies to highlight valuable lessons and an acute need for further social science research which should inform effective and context-appropriate future public health policy and action.</jats:p>
dc.language en
dc.publisher Springer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.ispartofseries Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.title Learning from the past & present: social science implications for COVID-19 immunity-based documentation
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1057/s41599-021-00898-4
pubs.issue 1
pubs.volume 8
dc.date.updated 2021-09-27T21:15:04Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.publication-status Published online
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.elements-id 867841
dc.identifier.eissn 2662-9992
pubs.number 219
pubs.online-publication-date 2021-9-27


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics