Physician Assisted Dying in New Zealand: A Qualitative Analysis of Submissions to the End of Life Choice Act

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Malpas, Phillipa
dc.contributor.advisor Owens, Glynn
dc.contributor.author Nourozi, Mona
dc.date.accessioned 2021-10-26T00:56:28Z
dc.date.available 2021-10-26T00:56:28Z
dc.date.issued 2021 en
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/57091
dc.description Full Text is available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland only. en
dc.description.abstract Physician-assisted dying (PAD) is a contentious issue, with increased recent interest given the efforts and success of the legalisation of PAD in numerous parts of the globe. New Zealand has now legalised PAD with the End of Life Choice Act 2019 (EOLCA), a legislative bill for PAD that received the most public submissions in New Zealand’s history. Despite this, there has not yet been a methodologically transparent and robust qualitative analysis of the submissions to ascertain central themes and concerns contained within these. This thesis aimed to thematically analyse the contents of a sample of 100 of the total submissions for the EOLCA to identify key themes and concerns that submissions raised. Secondary to this is the aim to contextualise these themes, concerns, and central arguments within national and international research to provide an educative stance. Qualitative thematic analysis, specifically a mixed approach using inductive and deductive methods primarily focused on semantic themes was utilised to conduct this research, accompanied by using the software NVivo 12 Plus. A total of 40 themes were identified. Of these, 16 themes were outlined in the results section, with a further discussion of the top 5, while 24 were excluded due to a master’s thesis' scope. They top five themes are: (1) PAD and the EOLCA puts vulnerable populations at risk; (2) the EOLCA enables undue pressure, misuse, and an undesirable sense of obligation to seek and provide PAD; (3) PAD and the EOLCA condone suicide; (4) The EOLCA is inadequate; and (5) PAD and the EOLCA violate the intrinsic value of life. The concerns and arguments made towards PAD and legalising it largely mirrored international research and literature. Submissions’ concerns or assertions were mostly unsupported by the contents of the EOLCA, literature, or data from overseas jurisdictions where PAD is legal. The limitations and strengths of my thesis, including implications of utilising submissions, were outlined. Suggestions for future research were identified, primarily regarding exploring four different potential associations and relationships between specific variables, for example, between risk-aversion and attitudes (e.g. support or opposition etc.) for PAD and the EOLCA.
dc.publisher ResearchSpace@Auckland en
dc.relation.ispartof Masters Thesis - University of Auckland en
dc.relation.isreferencedby UoA en
dc.rights Restricted Item. Full Text is available to authenticated members of The University of Auckland only. en
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm en
dc.rights.uri http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/nz/
dc.title Physician Assisted Dying in New Zealand: A Qualitative Analysis of Submissions to the End of Life Choice Act
dc.type Thesis en
thesis.degree.discipline Psychology
thesis.degree.grantor The University of Auckland en
thesis.degree.level Masters en
dc.date.updated 2021-09-07T23:59:36Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: the author en
dc.identifier.wikidata Q112956263


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics