Response Option Design in Surveys

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Brown, Gavin
dc.contributor.author Shulruf, B
dc.contributor.editor Ford, L
dc.contributor.editor Scandura, T
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-05T20:29:54Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-05T20:29:54Z
dc.date.issued 2023
dc.identifier.citation In the SAGE Handbook of Survey Development and Application. Editors: Ford, L., Scandura, T.. Sage 2023
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/57624
dc.description.abstract The development of knowledge depends, in part, on obtaining theoretically structured self-report data. Since the introduction of the balanced, 5-point, agreement rating scale and its summated scoring logic (Likert, 1932), researchers have often adopted this approach because of its simplicity. Each response option system has an impact on survey takers; respondents tend to assume that the response options have been intelligently selected to frame normal attitudes and use that information to guide their response (Schwarz, 1999). Hence, response options can elicit unintended response styles (e.g., central tendency, social desirability; OECD, 2013) or be subject to cultural norms (Shulruf, Hattie, & Dixon, 2008). Unsurprisingly, all response option systems have strengths and weaknesses. Problems in response option design can contribute to (1) low within-item discrimination among respondents, (2) challenges for use of parametric statistics, (3) challenges in interpreting scale sums or means, and (4) obstacles arising from participant response styles. Careful attention to response scale options can lead to robust item variance, minimise ceiling and floor effects, and increase scale reliability or consistency. In this chapter, we will address a number of common issues in the design of rating scales including: • Number of options presented (i.e., length of response scale), • Labelling of options, • Semantic values for anchor labels, • Use of neutral or don’t know responses, • Use of odd vs. even number of options, • Directional packing vs. balanced options, and • Capture of frequencies and quantities.
dc.publisher Sage
dc.relation.ispartof the SAGE Handbook of Survey Development and Application
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/book-content-oa-archiving-policy
dc.title Response Option Design in Surveys
dc.type Book Item
dc.date.updated 2021-11-11T00:18:04Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RetrictedAccess en
pubs.elements-id 860135
pubs.number 2.11


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics