Lifetime Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence and Disability: Results From a Population-Based Study in New Zealand.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Fanslow, Janet L
dc.contributor.author Malihi, Zarintaj A
dc.contributor.author Hashemi, Ladan
dc.contributor.author Gulliver, Pauline J
dc.contributor.author McIntosh, Tracey KD
dc.coverage.spatial Netherlands
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-07T21:25:44Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-07T21:25:44Z
dc.date.issued 2021-9
dc.identifier.citation American journal of preventive medicine 61(3):320-328 Sep 2021
dc.identifier.issn 0749-3797
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/57689
dc.description.abstract <h4>Introduction</h4>There is no population-based study on prevalence rates for all forms of intimate partner violence experienced by people with different types of disabilities in New Zealand. This study compares the reported lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence (physical, sexual, psychological, controlling behaviors, and economic abuse) for people with different types of disabilities with that reported by those without disabilities and tests whether there is a gender difference.<h4>Methods</h4>From March 2017 to March 2019, a total of 2,888 women and men aged ≥16 years participated in a cross-sectional study in New Zealand using a cluster random sampling method. Face-to-face interviews were used for data collection. The WHO Multi-country Study questionnaire was employed as the data collection tool. Logistic regression was conducted, and AORs were reported.<h4>Results</h4>Those with any disability reported significantly higher rates of most forms of intimate partner violence than those without disabilities, among both genders, including physical intimate partner violence (AOR=1.80, 95% CI=1.32, 2.47 for women, AOR=2.44, 95% CI=1.72, 3.45 for men) and psychological and economic abuse. Women with disabilities were more likely to report experiences of sexual intimate partner violence than men (range =13.5-17.1% vs 4.0%-21.2% in men). Men with intellectual disability were more likely to report physical intimate partner violence than women with intellectual disability (60.5% in men and 36.0% in women).<h4>Conclusions</h4>People with disabilities report experiencing a significantly high lifetime prevalence of intimate partner violence compared with people without disabilities. The results warrant policy and practice changes to identify early signs of abuse and intervene accordingly and warrant an investment in targeted violence prevention programs.
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Elsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofseries American journal of preventive medicine
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.rights.uri https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Prevalence
dc.subject Risk Factors
dc.subject Cross-Sectional Studies
dc.subject Disabled Persons
dc.subject Sexual Partners
dc.subject New Zealand
dc.subject Female
dc.subject Male
dc.subject Intimate Partner Violence
dc.subject Cross-Sectional Studies
dc.subject Disabled Persons
dc.subject Female
dc.subject Humans
dc.subject Intimate Partner Violence
dc.subject Male
dc.subject New Zealand
dc.subject Prevalence
dc.subject Risk Factors
dc.subject Sexual Partners
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
dc.subject Medicine, General & Internal
dc.subject General & Internal Medicine
dc.subject VICTIMIZATION
dc.subject HEALTH
dc.subject RISK
dc.subject PEOPLE
dc.subject WOMEN
dc.subject ABUSE
dc.subject 11 Medical and Health Sciences
dc.subject 13 Education
dc.title Lifetime Prevalence of Intimate Partner Violence and Disability: Results From a Population-Based Study in New Zealand.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.02.022
pubs.issue 3
pubs.begin-page 320
pubs.volume 61
dc.date.updated 2021-11-16T01:22:10Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34419229
pubs.end-page 328
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess en
pubs.subtype Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 861575
dc.identifier.eissn 1873-2607
dc.identifier.pii S0749-3797(21)00191-4


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics