Does body scanning through visual imagery improve perception and function in patients after anterior cruciate ligament-reconstruction? An exploratory study.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Amundsen, Olav
dc.contributor.author Starcevich, Cobie
dc.contributor.author Frisell, Even Johansen
dc.contributor.author Nordal, Tom
dc.contributor.author Williams, Sian
dc.contributor.author Mitchell, Tim
dc.contributor.author Beales, Darren
dc.coverage.spatial England
dc.date.accessioned 2021-12-12T21:53:16Z
dc.date.available 2021-12-12T21:53:16Z
dc.date.issued 2021-3-17
dc.identifier.issn 0959-3985
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/57735
dc.description.abstract <b>Introduction</b>: Many people who have undergone Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL)-reconstruction do not return to their pre-injury level, with nonphysical factors recognized as barriers to recovery. Fear of movement has been linked to body schema distortions, and interventions directed at the body schema have shown potential to improve function.<b>Objective</b>: 1) Describe participants' ability to perform a visual imagery intervention (Body Scan); 2) investigate knee perception differences; 3) investigate if Body Scan led to improvements in perceptual differences; and 4) determine if some individuals improved in functional measures following the intervention.<b>Methods</b>: A single-arm intervention study was undertaken in people >12-month post ACL-reconstruction (n = 30). Body Scan was delivered using a standardized script developed for this study. Participants were assessed regarding their capacity to perform the Body Scan, perceptual differences between the knees and how perception changed following the intervention. Functional measures (vertical hop, triple hop, mSEBT, quadriceps strength, and hamstring strength) were taken.<b>Results</b>: 96.7% were able to perform a Body Scan, with 93.1% demonstrating a difference in perception between the knees. Of participants with perceptual differences, 92.5% demonstrated improvement in perception following the intervention. Ten participants had a clinically significant improvement in a functional measure following the intervention.<b>Conclusion</b>: Most participants could perform Body Scanning. The majority perceived perceptual differences between operated and non-operated knees, and reported more symmetric perception following the intervention. One-third of participants also showed improvements in a functional performance measure. Results suggest this intervention may be a helpful adjunct to rehabilitation post ACL-reconstruction, with further research warranted.
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Informa UK Limited
dc.relation.ispartofseries Physiotherapy theory and practice
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
dc.subject body schema
dc.subject perceptual distortion
dc.subject rehabilitation
dc.subject visualization
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Rehabilitation
dc.subject Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
dc.subject body schema
dc.subject perceptual distortion
dc.subject rehabilitation
dc.subject visualization
dc.subject 1103 Clinical Sciences
dc.subject 1106 Human Movement and Sports Sciences
dc.title Does body scanning through visual imagery improve perception and function in patients after anterior cruciate ligament-reconstruction? An exploratory study.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/09593985.2021.1901328
pubs.begin-page 1
dc.date.updated 2021-11-08T22:24:24Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33726630
pubs.end-page 11
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 846878
dc.identifier.eissn 1532-5040
pubs.online-publication-date 2021-3-17


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics