dc.description.abstract |
This thesis set out to examine the views of Samoan teachers of social studies. The
compelling issue is that a migrant people from a former mandated New Zealand territory
in the South Pacific, have either migrated to New Zealand, or are New Zealand born, and
as migrant teachers or New Zealand born teachers, are expected to teach a curriculum
area which has comparatively limited traction in the classroom. It is important that we
address the issue of a particular migrant teaching force, teaching a curriculum area which
has attracted public attention, because of its approach and content. The controversy
surrounding the introduction of a compulsory social studies curriculum from Years 1 to
10, and the criticism levelled at it from interested parties, has polarised certain sectors in
education and the private and public sector, regarding its introduction. This problem
affects Samoan teachers who are required to teach in this area. The introduction of a
compulsory syllabus is compounded by preconceived notions surrounding the reluctance
to teach social studies and its ramifications on both teachers and students. Although set in
the context of a major multi-cultural city, this thesis will be of interest to other educators,
local body, and social justice advocates who have a vested interest in determining how a
sector of the community will respond to a controversial curriculum area taught by
Samoans, who are themselves representative of a minority population in New Zealand.
The literature identified that minority teachers in Europe, North America and the Pacific
respond to a growing awareness of indigenous and minority students, by adopting
teaching processes that are the product of well-meaning educators. The resulting
outcomes reflect the uncertainty and success of various initiatives, but the issue of
Samoan teachers teaching social studies in New Zealand has received limited attention.
This research undertook a qualitative approach using a narrative inquiry methodology to
allow Samoan teachers’ stories to be told. An auto-ethnography perspective is also used
to provide depth, with myself, as a Samoan teacher, researching and contributing to the
narrative.
The findings highlighted that there is a need for formal professional development in
social studies, that Samoan teachers need to take responsibility for their own historical
and social studies knowledge-based learning, and that Samoan teachers will resort to their
own cultural perspectives in deference to a curriculum-based ideology. These findings are
explained by using Bleicher’s (1980) theoretical constructivist approach, incorporating
features of interpretive social science, in an effort to understand individual Samoan’s
underlying reasons for pursuing their respective courses of action. The research
contributes to our growing understanding of the interactions between a specific Pasifika
teaching cohort, and a curriculum area that courts controversy in a way that other
curriculum areas do not. |
|