Accuracy of ultrasound in the estimation of customised birth weight in a public hospital service.

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Ridha, Noor
dc.contributor.author Bergin, Colleen J
dc.contributor.author Kelly, Joanne
dc.contributor.author Tarr, Gregory P
dc.contributor.author Anderson, Ngaire
dc.contributor.author Sadler, Lynn
dc.coverage.spatial Australia
dc.date.accessioned 2022-05-06T03:50:22Z
dc.date.available 2022-05-06T03:50:22Z
dc.date.issued 2022-03-28
dc.identifier.citation (2022). Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology.
dc.identifier.issn 1754-9477
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2292/59018
dc.description.abstract <h4>Introduction</h4>Studies have shown that ultrasound estimated foetal weight (EFW) in small for gestational age (SGA) babies tends to be less-accurate when compared to appropriate (AGA) and large (LGA) for gestational age babies. We aimed to analyse the accuracy of ultrasound EFW overall, and by customised birth weight centile category (severe SGA, SGA, AGA, LGA). Also, the accuracy of estimating the centile category using calculated customised EFW centiles.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a retrospective study of pregnant women between 20-43 weeks gestation who underwent ultrasound within 7 days of delivery at a large tertiary maternity unit between January 2018 and December 2020. Stillbirths, major foetal anomalies and multiple pregnancies were excluded. The EFW and birth weight were compared, and an accurate estimate defined as ≤15% difference. The customised EFW and birth weight centiles were calculated and used to analyse the accuracy of category prediction.<h4>Results</h4>Of 2061 foetuses included, 92% (n = 1902) were born weighing within 15% of their EFW. Accuracy was not affected by maternal BMI, ethnicity, parity or gestation. 87% of SGA babies were within 15% of their EFW. Ultrasound sensitivity for SGA was 51% (95% CI: 46-55%). The specificity and positive predictive values were 97% (95% CI: 96-98%) and 87% (95% CI: 82-90%) respectively.<h4>Conclusion</h4>The accuracy of Ultrasound EFW overall is good, however, is reduced in SGA babies whose EFW and birth weight centile categories tended to be overestimated. The high specificity for SGA supports monitoring with a lowered threshold to intervene in pregnancies identified by ultrasound as SGA.
dc.format.medium Print-Electronic
dc.language eng
dc.publisher Wiley
dc.relation.ispartofseries Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology
dc.rights Items in ResearchSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Previously published items are made available in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
dc.rights.uri https://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/docs/uoa-docs/rights.htm
dc.subject birth weight
dc.subject customised centile
dc.subject foetal weight
dc.subject gestational age
dc.subject ultrasonography
dc.subject Preterm, Low Birth Weight and Health of the Newborn
dc.subject Pediatric
dc.subject Clinical Research
dc.subject Perinatal Period - Conditions Originating in Perinatal Period
dc.subject Infant Mortality
dc.subject 4.2 Evaluation of markers and technologies
dc.subject Reproductive health and childbirth
dc.subject Science & Technology
dc.subject Life Sciences & Biomedicine
dc.subject Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
dc.subject BODY-MASS INDEX
dc.subject FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE
dc.subject FETAL WEIGHT
dc.subject INFANTS
dc.subject 1103 Clinical Sciences
dc.subject 1110 Nursing
dc.subject 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis
dc.title Accuracy of ultrasound in the estimation of customised birth weight in a public hospital service.
dc.type Journal Article
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/1754-9485.13408
dc.date.updated 2022-04-27T02:08:29Z
dc.rights.holder Copyright: The author en
dc.identifier.pmid 35343630 (pubmed)
pubs.author-url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35343630
pubs.publication-status Published
dc.rights.accessrights http://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/RestrictedAccess en
pubs.subtype Journal Article
pubs.elements-id 893441
pubs.org-id Medical and Health Sciences
pubs.org-id School of Medicine
pubs.org-id Obstetrics and Gynaecology
dc.identifier.eissn 1754-9485
pubs.record-created-at-source-date 2022-04-27
pubs.online-publication-date 2022-03-28


Files in this item

Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Share

Search ResearchSpace


Browse

Statistics